Re: MARS last call: packet formats
Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com> Sat, 04 November 1995 00:48 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00487;
3 Nov 95 19:48 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00483;
3 Nov 95 19:48 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.99.5]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA14567;
Fri, 3 Nov 1995 19:18:27 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
TAA02905 for rolc-out; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 19:28:16 -0500
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA02896 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 19:28:14 -0500
Received: from lightning.synoptics.com (lightning.synoptics.com
[134.177.3.18]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA14490 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 1995 19:15:11 -0500
Received: from pobox.synoptics.com ([134.177.1.95]) by lightning.synoptics.com
(4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA15928; Fri, 3 Nov 95 16:20:28 PST
Received: from milliways-le0.engwest (milliways-le0.synoptics.com) by
pobox.synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA19102; Fri, 3 Nov 95 16:21:51 PST
Received: by milliways-le0.engwest (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA03094; Fri, 3 Nov 95 16:21:50 PST
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 95 16:21:50 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com>
Message-Id: <9511040021.AA03094@milliways-le0.engwest>
To: ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com, james@ca.newbridge.com
Subject: Re: MARS last call: packet formats
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
> From atmpost@matmos.hpl.hp.com Fri Nov 3 16:05:14 1995 > From: James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com> > Subject: Re: MARS last call: packet formats > To: ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 1995 18:46:25 -0500 (EST) James, > Andrew Smith (provocatively) wrote: > +--------- > |>>Since we are in last call, can someone just summarise for the > |>>list the arguments that lead to MARS extending the control packet > |>>formats from ATM-ARP in RFC 1577, rather than those proposed for use in > |>>NHRP. > +--------- ... > (*) As a gross over-simplification, in both cases the client says "please > Mr. Server, tell me what NBMA destinations should receive packets with this > destination." One could also observe that LANE (and presumably LANEv2) requests for MAC->ATM addresses fall into this same categorisation. And some MPOA requests are likely to as well .... Andrew ******************************************************************************** Andrew Smith TEL: +1 408 764 1574 Technology Synergy FAX: +1 408 988 5525 Bay Networks, Inc. E-m: asmith@baynetworks.com Santa Clara, CA *********************************************************************************
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats James Watt
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats Grenville Armitage
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats Andrew Smith
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) James Watt
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) George Swallow
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) James Luciani
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) Andrew Smith
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) Yakov Rekhter
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) James Luciani
- Re: MARS last call: packet formats (fwd) Joel Halpern