Re: ARP and NHRP question
Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com> Tue, 28 November 1995 19:56 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25637;
28 Nov 95 14:56 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa25633;
28 Nov 95 14:56 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.98.5]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA18145;
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:26:40 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
OAA15061 for rolc-out; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:37:38 -0500
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA15052 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:37:33 -0500
Received: from terra.com21.com (terra.com21.com [140.174.223.21]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA18095 for <rolc@nexen.com>;
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 14:22:51 -0500
Received: (laubach@localhost) by terra.com21.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id LAA26236;
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:56:17 -0800
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mark Laubach <laubach@terra.com21.com>
To: Juha Heinanen <jh@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
cc: salo@msc.edu, james@ca.newbridge.com, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com,
rolc@nexen.com
Subject: Re: ARP and NHRP question
In-Reply-To: <199511280819.KAA18909@lohi.dat.tele.fi>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951128115532.25774C-100000@terra.com21.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
> it is a good idea in the long run to get rid of two protocols and use > nhrp for resolving all adresses. but in order for that to work, nhrp > MUST support server redundancy like 1577++ does. it makes no sense to > issue an nhrp rfc before that capability is in. Agreed, with emphasis underlining "in the long run". Mark
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Eric W. Gray
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith