Re: VCC cost models .... (was Re: Limits

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net> Mon, 06 May 1996 17:17 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21111; 6 May 96 13:17 EDT
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21106; 6 May 96 13:17 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA26728; Mon, 6 May 1996 13:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA25385 for rolc-out; Mon, 6 May 1996 13:04:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA25376 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Mon, 6 May 1996 13:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (brookfield-ef0.brookfield.ans.net [204.148.1.20]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA26655 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Mon, 6 May 1996 13:04:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from brookfield.ans.net (localhost.brookfield.ans.net [127.0.0.1]) by brookfield.ans.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA10884; Mon, 6 May 1996 13:02:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199605061702.NAA10884@brookfield.ans.net>
To: "Silverman, Steve" <ssilverman@reston.btna.com>
cc: rolc <rolc@nexen.com>
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
Subject: Re: VCC cost models .... (was Re: Limits
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 14:20:00 EDT." <199605021712.NAA12419@guelah.nexen.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 13:02:02 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe to rolc-request@nexen.com, submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: Email archive at ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
X-Info: Hypermail archive at http://cell-relay.indiana.edu/mail/archives/rolc/
X-Info: FTP archive at ftp://ftp.nexen.com/pub/rolc/

In message <199605021712.NAA12419@guelah.nexen.com>, "Silverman, Steve" writes:
> 
> I think there is confusion over price vs. costs.   The Internet has always
> been cheap in price because the US government subsidized it.  If you knew 
> what
> it actually cost during the early '80s,  those of you who payed those taxes 
> would howl!


The cost to the NSF of the NSFNET DS3 backbone was about $10M per year
during the late 1980s and early 1990s.  Toward the end of this period
there were an estimated 2M directly attached hosts in the US based on
the DNS walk of in-addr space.  That comes to about $5 per year per
host for the cost of the backbone as a very rough estimate.  Compare
this to the $2B that UUNET was recently valued at and the fact that
UUNET is only one Internet service provider.

In contrast, one fighter plane or nuclear submarine is as costly or
more than the 5 years of NSFNET backbone network service.  I suggest
you read the OIG report of March 23, 1993 which reviewed the NSFNET
program and spoke very highly of its cost effectiveness.  The NSFNET
program is often cited for its enormous return on a small government
research effort by the NSF.

Curtis