IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft rolc minutes

Werner Almesberger <almesber@lrc.epfl.ch> Fri, 21 July 1995 12:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08062; 21 Jul 95 8:54 EDT
Received: from nexen.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08058; 21 Jul 95 8:54 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA19979; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 08:37:29 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA28661 for rolc-out; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 08:33:50 -0400
Received: from nexen.nexen.com (nexen.nexen.com [204.249.96.18]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA28652 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 08:33:47 -0400
Received: from lrcsun1.epfl.ch (lrcsun1.epfl.ch [128.178.156.12]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA19848 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 08:33:40 -0400
Received: (from almesber@localhost) by lrcsun1.epfl.ch (8.6.12/8.6.9) id OAA22594 for rolc@nexen.com; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:08:29 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Werner Almesberger <almesber@lrc.epfl.ch>
Message-Id: <199507211208.OAA22594@lrcsun1.epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: draft rolc minutes
To: rolc@nexen.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:08:29 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <v02110105ac352e5bc18d@[39.11.22.35]> from "Andy Malis" at Jul 21, 95 12:15:30 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 613
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Andy Malis wrote:
> During the discussion, Joel Halpern described how NHRP can be transition
> into a network without server mode.

So the deployment model would now no longer distinguish between sparse
(server mode) vs. dense (fabric mode) deployment, but between deployment
in small clusters (i.e. where you have NHRP end-to-end on all hops) vs.
in the whole network ?

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, DI-LRC,EPFL,CH   werner.almesberger@lrc.di.epfl.ch /
/_IN_R_311__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email