NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary

Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Tue, 22 August 1995 22:01 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22464; 22 Aug 95 18:01 EDT
Received: from nexen.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22457; 22 Aug 95 18:01 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA29223; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:48:06 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA04642 for rolc-out; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:40:18 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA04631 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:40:13 -0400
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.32]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA19620 for <rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 17:37:33 -0400
Received: from puli.cisco.com (puli.cisco.com [171.69.1.174]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id OAA12816 for rolc@nexen.com; Tue, 22 Aug 1995 14:38:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199508222138.OAA12816@hubbub.cisco.com>
To: rolc@nexen.com
Subject: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 95 14:38:24 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Folks,

It seems that the following two extensions:

  - NHRP Forward NHS Record Extension

  - NHRP Reverse NHS Record Extension

do not serve any useful purposes in NHRP. Therefore I would suggest
to delete them.

Yakov.