Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes
Andy Malis <malis@enigma.acton.timeplex.com> Thu, 27 April 1995 21:30 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10889;
27 Apr 95 17:30 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
id aa10885; 27 Apr 95 17:30 EDT
Received: from enigma.acton.timeplex.com (enigma.acton.timeplex.com
[134.196.22.57]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) with
ESMTP id RAA08526; Thu, 27 Apr 1995 17:24:56 -0400
Received: from localhost.acton.timeplex.com (localhost.acton.timeplex.com
[127.0.0.1]) by enigma.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-SUB-1.0) with SMTP id
RAA10621; Thu, 27 Apr 1995 17:24:53 -0400
Message-Id: <199504272124.RAA10621@enigma.acton.timeplex.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: enigma.acton.timeplex.com: Host
localhost.acton.timeplex.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Kent W. England" <kwe@6sigmanets.com>
cc: malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com, rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com,
jhalpern@newbridge.com, laubach@terra.com21.com, ddp@fore.com
Subject: Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes
Reply-To: malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 27 Apr 1995 10:52:20 -0800."
<v02110104abc57240d354@[129.245.50.56]>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 1995 17:24:52 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andy Malis <malis@enigma.acton.timeplex.com>
Kent, > >Drew Perkins, the ATM Forum liaison to the IETF, announced a relaxation > >in the ATM Forum's document distribution policy, to allow ROLC, IP/ATM, > >and other relevant working groups easier access to ATM Forum documents, > >including electronic access. > I recently checked the ATM Forum web server for something along > these lines but found nothing. Are we to wait until the next IETF > to talk about it more, or will the ATM Forum release draft > documents? You're not the first person to ask this question. I've specifically included Drew on this reply so that he and Joel (as the two official liaisons between the Forum and the IETF) can jointly yank whatever chains are necessary on the Forum side to convert words into action. > Why not enter Forum drafts into the Internet Drafts system under > rolc or ipatm? It's a fine idea, but it can only be done by the holders of the documents' intellectual property rights. This can either be the author or authors, if the document is an original contribution, or the Forum itself, in the case of draft or completed specifications and agreements. It can't be done by me (unless I wrote the contribution in question) or by the IETF. In fact, all ATM Forum documents (draft or otherwise) contain the following as a part of their boilerplate: "(C) 1995 The ATM Forum. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means." (Please don't report me to the copyright police for reproducing that much of the document boilerplate! :-) So, the IETF can't turn these into I-Ds on its own. Now, the actual mechanism the Forum uses to implement the policy might include publication as an I-D, but that's also up to the Forum to say. Just so it's clear: this particular message is Copyright (C) 1995 Ascom Nexion, may be forwarded or redistributed in its entirety, and may be partially quoted for the purpose of generating replies. So there! Cheers, Andy __________________________________________________________________________ Andrew G. Malis malis@maelstrom.timeplex.com +1 508 266-4522 Ascom Nexion 289 Great Rd., Acton MA 01720 USA FAX: +1 508 266-2300
- ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Andy Malis
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Kent W. England
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Andy Malis
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Joel Halpern
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Kent W. England
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Mark Laubach
- Re: ROLC/IPATM Joint meeting final minutes Drew D. Perkins