stupid questions for IP address registration to NHS

Hiroshi Esaki <hiroshi@ctr.columbia.edu> Fri, 07 July 1995 17:56 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09132; 7 Jul 95 13:56 EDT
Received: from [204.249.96.18] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09128; 7 Jul 95 13:56 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA03835; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:38:42 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA24734 for rolc-out; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:22:00 -0400
Received: from sirius.ctr.columbia.edu (root@sirius.ctr.columbia.edu [128.59.64.60]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA24723 for <rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:21:53 -0400
Received: from mimas.ctr.columbia.edu (mimas.ctr.columbia.edu [128.59.74.18]) by sirius.ctr.columbia.edu (8.6.11/8.6.4.287) with ESMTP id NAA16755; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:21:40 -0400
Received: (hiroshi@localhost) by mimas.ctr.columbia.edu (8.6.11/8.6.4.788743) id NAA15610; Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:21:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 13:21:37 -0400
Message-Id: <199507071721.NAA15610@mimas.ctr.columbia.edu>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Hiroshi Esaki <hiroshi@ctr.columbia.edu>
To: rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
Subject: stupid questions for IP address registration to NHS
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

Hi, 

Sorry, I have stupid questions. 
I am afraid the discussion associated with these questions has 
already done in this mailing-list...... But, please let me ask. 

Could you please clarify the following questions ? 

Regarding a Registration procedure of end-station to NHS (Section 5.4), 
 
 (1) Is it possible to register more than one IP address by 
     the single registration message ? 
     I mean one registration packet can include multiple 
     IP addresses to be registered by the single message ? 
     Or, we must use separate message to register multiple IP 
     addresses according to one ATM address ? 

 (2) Is it possible to register IP address with address mask ? 
     Mask option (5.6.1) is for NHRP Reply. 
     I thought the end-station (could be transition node, i.e. 
     router) wanted to register its IP address with address mask 
     that the end-station can serve. 


Thank you in advance, 

Hiroshi Esaki