Re: NHRP/MARS version number location.
James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com> Fri, 29 December 1995 22:25 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17785;
29 Dec 95 17:25 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17781;
29 Dec 95 17:25 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.99.5]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA13931;
Fri, 29 Dec 1995 16:53:38 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
RAA03504 for rolc-out; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:20 -0500
Received: from nexen.nexen.com (nexen.nexen.com [204.249.96.18]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA03495;
Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:17 -0500
Received: from ns.newbridge.com (ns.newbridge.com [192.75.23.67]) by
nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA12615;
Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:08:01 -0500
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA02355;
Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:10 -0500
Received: from portero(192.75.23.66) by ns via smap (V1.3)
id sma002350; Fri Dec 29 17:04:04 1995
Received: from thor.ca.newbridge.com (thor121.ca.newbridge.com
[138.120.121.43]) by kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id
RAA27195; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:03 -0500
Received: from fields.newbridge ([138.120.144.160]) by thor.ca.newbridge.com
(8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA05413; Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:03 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com>
Message-Id: <199512292204.RAA05413@thor.ca.newbridge.com>
Subject: Re: NHRP/MARS version number location.
To: James Luciani <luciani@nexen.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 17:04:01 -0500 (EST)
Cc: salo@msc.edu, rolc@nexen.com, ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com,
gja@thumper.bellcore.com
In-Reply-To: <199512290440.XAA05295@shovel.nexen.com> from "James Luciani" at
Dec 28, 95 11:40:13 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 871
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe to rolc-request@nexen.com, submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: Email archive at ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
X-Info: Hypermail archive at http://cell-relay.indiana.edu/mail/archives/rolc/
X-Info: FTP archive at ftp://ftp.nexen.com/pub/rolc/
Folks: Can we summarize this as:
a) if you use a PID of 00-00-5E-00-03 you get the fixed header defined for IP-MC and NHRP, b) the ar$op.version field specifies both a "protocol" and a version, i.e. 0 => IP-MC version 1 1 => NHRP version 1 and 2 could be either NHRP version 2, IP-MC version 2 or version 1 of some yet unimagined protocol (as long as it was an IETF effort) and the meaning of 0xFF must be conveyed "out of band" (both the protocol and version) ? If so, we might want to add the one line to clarify this next time we edit the documents. If not, can someone please point out what I missed. Regards, -james ____________________________________________________________________________ James W. Watt, james@newbridge.com Ph: +1 613 591-3600 Newbridge Networks 600 March Rd Kanata ON Canada K2K 2E6 FAX:+1 613 591-3680
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. Grenville Armitage
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. Tim Salo
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. Grenville Armitage
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. James Luciani
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. Tim Salo
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. Grenville Armitage
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. James Watt
- Re: NHRP/MARS version number location. James Luciani