Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary
Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com> Wed, 23 August 1995 22:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24179;
23 Aug 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from nexen.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24175;
23 Aug 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.97.5]) by
nexen.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA20522;
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:57:14 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
RAA20153 for rolc-out; Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:51:40 -0400
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA20144;
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:51:37 -0400
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.32]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA26157;
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 17:48:49 -0400
Received: from puli.cisco.com (puli.cisco.com [171.69.1.174]) by
hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with SMTP id OAA17880;
Wed, 23 Aug 1995 14:49:45 -0700
Message-Id: <199508232149.OAA17880@hubbub.cisco.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <malis@nexen.com>
cc: rolc@nexen.com
Subject: Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Aug 95 17:33:53 EDT."
<199508232133.RAA05331@phish.acton.timeplex.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 95 14:49:44 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@cisco.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
> > - NHRP Forward NHS Record Extension > > - NHRP Reverse NHS Record Extension > > > > do not serve any useful purposes in NHRP. Therefore I would suggest > > to delete them. > > I strongly disagree. I expect these to be invaluable for debugging an > implementation, and when tracking down the inevitable operational > problems once NHRP has been deployed. Fine. Just say that these two options are for debugging. Yakov.
- NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Yakov Rekhter
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew G. Malis
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Yakov Rekhter
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew Smith
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Joel Halpern
- Re: NHS Record extensions seem to be unnecessary Andrew Smith