Re: draft-rekhter-ip-atm-architecture-00.txt

Grenville Armitage <gja@thumper.bellcore.com> Tue, 09 May 1995 20:12 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09476; 9 May 95 16:12 EDT
Received: from maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09461; 9 May 95 16:12 EDT
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) id PAA00916 for rolc-out; Tue, 9 May 1995 15:43:12 -0400
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com (thumper.bellcore.com [128.96.41.1]) by maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com (8.6.9/ACTON-MAIN-1.2) with ESMTP id PAA00909 for <rolc@maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com>; Tue, 9 May 1995 15:43:05 -0400
Received: from thumper (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumper.bellcore.com (8.6.9/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA16451; Tue, 9 May 1995 15:38:48 -0400
Message-Id: <199505091938.PAA16451@thumper.bellcore.com>
To: yakov@watson.ibm.com
cc: ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@maelstrom.acton.timeplex.com, gja@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: draft-rekhter-ip-atm-architecture-00.txt
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 09 May 1995 15:12:20 -0400. <199505091913.AA256446802@matmos.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 1995 15:38:46 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Grenville Armitage <gja@thumper.bellcore.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@maelstrom.timeplex.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@maelstrom.timeplex.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/

>>So, let's propose to use the term "ASP" -- Application Specific
>>Partition.

'Partition' sounds so much like open-plan offices, but I suppose
I can see why Application Specific Scope would have problems :)

gja