Re: ARP and NHRP question
Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com> Wed, 29 November 1995 03:50 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08966;
28 Nov 95 22:50 EST
Received: from guelah.nexen.com by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08962;
28 Nov 95 22:50 EST
Received: from maelstrom.nexen.com (maelstrom.nexen.com [204.249.98.5]) by
guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA21423;
Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:22:12 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
WAA19498 for rolc-out; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:34:52 -0500
Received: from guelah.nexen.com (guelah.nexen.com [204.249.96.19]) by
maelstrom.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA19489 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:34:48 -0500
Received: from lightning.synoptics.com (lightning.synoptics.com
[134.177.3.18]) by guelah.nexen.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA21418 for
<rolc@nexen.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 22:20:24 -0500
Received: from pobox.synoptics.com ([134.177.1.95]) by lightning.synoptics.com
(4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07095; Tue, 28 Nov 95 19:28:06 PST
Received: from milliways-le0.engwest (milliways-le0.synoptics.com) by
pobox.synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA27517; Tue, 28 Nov 95 19:29:31 PST
Received: by milliways-le0.engwest (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA14306; Tue, 28 Nov 95 19:29:30 PST
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 95 19:29:30 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andrew Smith <asmith@baynetworks.com>
Message-Id: <9511290329.AA14306@milliways-le0.engwest>
To: bryang@eng.adaptec.com
Subject: Re: ARP and NHRP question
Cc: ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rolc@nexen.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Info: Submissions to rolc@nexen.com
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to rolc-request@nexen.com
X-Info: Archives for rolc via
ftp://ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/ietf-mail-archive/rolc/
> From atmpost@matmos.hpl.hp.com Mon Nov 27 20:20:50 1995 > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 95 19:33:54 PST > From: bryang@eng.adaptec.com (Bryan Gleeson) > To: salo@msc.edu > Subject: Re: ARP and NHRP question > Cc: ip-atm@matmos.hpl.hp.com, rolc@nexen.com Bryan, > We should allow clients to use _one_ address > resolution protocol, namely NHRP. We should require that NHRP servers > also implement ATMARP server functionality, so that a client can use > either ATMARP or NHRP. I still don't understand the need for a son-of-1577 spec to *mandate* that a server implement both ATMARP and NHRP: isn't it sufficient to state that there exist two protocols and that servers may come across clients implementing both. This is the approach that IETF specs have always taken in the past and implementors decide what makes sense in their products. I don't believe this approach would lead to many "wrong" choices in this case. > There should definitely not be a requirement > that a client must try ATMARP first, and then NHRP, or NHRP first > and then ATMARP. This is just the principle of pushing the complexity > into a small number of servers rather than a large number of clients. (I use the term "ATMARPv2" to mean "whichever one we choose for son-of-1577") I agree. But in addition, I think that the 1577v2 client behaviour should not mention ATMARPv1. It only needs to mention ATMARPv2. A 1577v2 client implementor should not need to go back and refer to 1577 itself. This is an entirely seperate issue from whether a ATMARPv2 server has to understand ATMARPv1 which I think is an implementation choice. It is also interesting to note that this issue becomes much simpler because of the fact that ATMARP requests do not get relayed to clients for answering. Andrew ******************************************************************************** Andrew Smith TEL: +1 408 764 1574 Technology Synergy Unit FAX: +1 408 988 5525 Bay Networks, Inc. E-m: asmith@baynetworks.com Santa Clara, CA ********************************************************************************
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Eric W. Gray
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Tim Salo
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Grenville Armitage
- Re: ARP and NHRP question James Watt
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Carl Marcinik
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Juha Heinanen
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Bryan Gleeson
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Mark Laubach
- Re: ARP and NHRP question Andrew Smith