Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 06 October 2020 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904063A147F; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVIZWMv6wK1I; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC5653A0EAF; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCCD389AF; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bOjHUw677fcd; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5608D389AD; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4C870D; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 14:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves@ietf.org>, "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxgYifi+U=fTdFk5Fz+a1ArbFUzxBbeDeORhk30n2N3Ew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESszw4SuUQtchiqk-o7Z=62X+U2af4==X5S_=rJ-3y4Dn=w@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356593481245BC85A03D4003D83F0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxgYifi+U=fTdFk5Fz+a1ArbFUzxBbeDeORhk30n2N3Ew@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:22:15 -0400
Message-ID: <29990.1602008535@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/-rxaqbA9cPqBkCPWDCnrUD3j56o>
Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves-18
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 18:22:19 -0000
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > ... 510 7.1. Support of 6LoWPAN ND doc> 512 In order to obtain routing services from a 6LR, a RUL MUST doc> implement 513 [RFC8505] and set the "R" and "T" flags in the doc> EARO. The RUL SHOULD 514 support [AP-ND] to protect the ownership of doc> its addresses. The RUL 515 MUST NOT request routing services from a doc> 6LR that does not originate 516 RA messages with a CIO that has the L, doc> P, and E flags all set as 517 discussed in Section 3.3.1, unless doc> configured to do so. > [major] I may be lost already... A RUL is by definition RPL-unaware. > It then follows that a RUL can't be assumed to be aware of this > specification, right? If so, then all the Normative language used in > this section can't be used because we can't specify the behavior of a > node that (by definition) is not aware of this document. [See more > related comments below.] We would have liked to have written a document that explained how to support RFC8504-compliant hosts, and at the time of 8504, we tried to make this an issue, but we failed. So, yes, a RUL has to be aware of this document, and RFC8505, but it does need to speak RPL. Such a node could be connected to a MANET or OLSR mesh using RFC8505-ND equally well. Maybe we should consider changing the title of the document? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leave… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Alvaro Retana
- [Roll] In what way is roll-unaware-leaves updatin… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] In what way is roll-unaware-leaves upd… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] In what way is roll-unaware-leaves upd… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] In what way is roll-unaware-leaves upd… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-unaware-l… Michael Richardson