Re: [Roll] [6lo] [6tisch] Call to confirm a rough consensus on RPL info

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 22 October 2014 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD431A90A0; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4FSiv5QgLcw; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3EE51A907A; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 05:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9MCO4hu012869; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:24:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.113] (p54890FCC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.15.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B6C3CB0; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A1872F@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:24:01 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 435673440.051628-f7d30f12c663ad521055136c3bd8f5b4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <687C8C64-CF05-405D-99DA-BCA6F7F3C60D@tzi.org>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842E1AEC5@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <CAMsDxWQKgRvY+4LmMEB9LWqNQDipCmeq8ot3aR=wJNedgstVnA@mail.gmail.com> <CADJ9OA94sQESoqAb4uJHV5NML2FroSXk9QfjPBujAUXgsKQfqw@mail.gmail.com> <D06C76D5.2136%randy.turner@landisgyr.com> <CADJ9OA809GACzt0+hCP87eWdBb+QZ=zESf-YbGD+YK73WTVoJw@mail.gmail.com> <4F0DAD50-F95F-4A07-B20C-4A1EC225BC14@amalfisystems.com> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A1872F@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/-zh8CL9j8RBOm33MAVKzBRuFi0M
Cc: Randy Turner <rturner@amalfisystems.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] [6tisch] Call to confirm a rough consensus on RPL info
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:24:26 -0000

On 22 Oct 2014, at 14:21, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 6554 already optimizes by factoring prefixes

Well, yes.  It still has a lot of static overhead.
More importantly, in keeping with the routing header construction, it keeps the full list downstream, which appears to me as a big waste of energy.

Grüße, Carsten