Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA7A1201EA
 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id uep9GyT9gSCv for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B061201E4
 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [162.253.141.186])
 by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25BCB1F44B
 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:57:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179)
 id 947BA1431; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <MN2PR11MB3565E133DA12559F333A78B8D8C00@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB3565E133DA12559F333A78B8D8C00@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
 message dated "Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:49:00 -0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:58:03 -0400
Message-ID: <22182.1564174683@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/0SHB96KeJbCnDHBl-hajzjg4j2U>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Compressing the PDAO natively
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>,
 <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>,
 <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 20:57:56 -0000


Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > Having a native PDAO format would allow to copy paste the source route
    > header
    > in non-storing PDAO. Would make the messages shorter. Would hint how =
to do
    > the rest of the RPL control plane compression.

Interesting.

    > I=E2=80=99m willing to propose an update in that direction, would lik=
e to see
    > feedback on the ML.

    > What do you all think?

Years ago, I applied GHC to RPL control packets, and I got rather good
results.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh network=
s [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect=
  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails  =
  [

