Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 12 March 2014 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1A71A0747 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.019
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKOO3oTAjGwg for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF631A0488 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCA12002F; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 18:15:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AFAA4647C9; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEB0647C8; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <CF45ACCA.2A341%d.sturek@att.net>
References: <CF45ACCA.2A341%d.sturek@att.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:56:02 -0400
Message-ID: <5544.1394657762@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/0cbtiemFGCi8LDCkRpm3AuiL1uk
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] interest in asymmetrical links support?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:56:10 -0000

Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net> wrote:
    > In ZigBee IP, we use Mesh Link Establishment (MLE) to exchange ETX
    > information between one hop neighbors then pruned the neighbor table to
    > remove asymmetric links.

It would be interesting if anonimized complete data (with the asymmetries) from some
actual deploy could be made available to the research people...

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/