[Roll] MPL draft 2
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 22 October 2012 13:53 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A3A21F8BB6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0jZ1Sod+iCW for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD68321F8BBD for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube4.xs4all.net [194.109.20.200]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9MDrG5C083897; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:53:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stokcons@xs4all.nl)
Received: from a82-95-140-48.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.140.48]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:53:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:53:16 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: jonathan hui <jonhui@cisco.com>, richard kelsey <richard.kelsey@silabs.com>, roll@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Message-ID: <b63ab06f593adc7994e625697c10d341@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (iPDgIr5/pijF9sX/3tMpEZ2t0H2TyEFe)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: [Roll] MPL draft 2
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:53:50 -0000
Hi Jonathan and Richard, thanks for the new MPL draft. During a first reading I had some problems with the domain concept. I understood that a domain may be composed of several link-local scopes. When configuring an interface with one link-local scope I should like to reject link-local multicasts which come from link-local neigbors that do not belong to the domain for which the interface is configured. For example: closely spaced wireless nodes which have different edge routers. To express the domain in the multicast address were you thinking of "transient" and "unicast prefix based" mc addresses with format ff32::prefix:group?. Configuring the interface with a link-local scope limited to one prefix may cover the domain concept adequately. In my opinion some text on interface configuration to implement packet rejection based on Mc domain will be useful. Greetings Peter -- Peter van der Stok mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org www: www.vanderstok.org tel NL: +31(0)492474673 F: +33(0)966015248
- [Roll] MPL draft 2 peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] MPL draft 2 Jonathan Hui (johui)
- Re: [Roll] MPL draft 2 peter van der Stok