Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Fri, 18 March 2016 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A702812D56D; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aqZQjem7hmC; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C6412D51B; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298F188158; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [76.21.129.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BEB328081A; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
References: <BN1PR03MB0725DAF0801633B06EB4018958B0@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0a3e093af6aa4648abc0ed798d92ae5c@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <8928.1458305306@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <11622bd30cf747a8af0c3a9710d3af89@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <5250.1458330404@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <0188F630-1D0B-4254-AB8F-7F339A2D1382@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <0188F630-1D0B-4254-AB8F-7F339A2D1382@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA9B8E10-A759-478D-B40B-7D670A5A4EB5@innovationslab.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13D15)
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:13:46 -0400
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/1Y8F15XpsS6PCTFrPEMAJRTP13I>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 21:38:04 -0700
Cc: "6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch@tools.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>, "roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch@tools.ietf.org>, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, "James Woodyatt \(jhw@nestlabs.com\)" <jhw@nestlabs.com>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 23:13:51 -0000

Works for me as well.

Regards,
Brian

> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> That works for me.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> Thumb-typed and autocorrected..
> 
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>>> Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done and
>>> happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL
>>> perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to
>>> RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel the
>>> consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate the last
>>> call to ROLL?
>> 
>> I think that would suffice, if ADs approve.