Re: [Roll] [6lo] Fwd: Constrained Node/Network Cluster @ IETF93, early draft version

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 22 June 2015 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A630C1A03E3; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BcERNvFrXr5o; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD65A1A1B00; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC17B880ED; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brians-mbp.jhuapl.edu (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C73136833E; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55881FE6.9030700@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:47:02 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, roll@ietf.org, 6tisch@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org, 6lo@ietf.org
References: <5584AFFA.7030507@tzi.org> <5584B05F.4030307@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5584B05F.4030307@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cElibchOaToVrmulAJhdg5d60IBIMq8SA"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/298ScvGn6wl9-2MjcvffYzGNuTI>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] Fwd: Constrained Node/Network Cluster @ IETF93, early draft version
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:47:09 -0000

Hi Carsten,
     Just one point...

On 6/19/15 8:14 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> 
> Here is my usual eclectic condensed agenda built from that.
> (Bye, bye, appsawg.  lwig over roll is interesting; at least we do
> have a roll meeting at all.)

LWIG and ROLL do not list each other as conflicts to avoid.  If folks
think this is an issue, please discuss it with the LWIG and ROLL chairs
to see if they will add the appropriate entries in their
conflicts-to-avoid list.

Regards,
Brian