[Roll] reminder - end of second WG LC

JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> Wed, 23 May 2012 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jpv@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEBC21F8624 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bw7xe0eEsn6i for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgl-iport-2.cisco.com (bgl-iport-2.cisco.com [72.163.197.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E027B21F8623 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=11056; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1337809834; x=1339019434; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=Z/cijLCbtYOzByBaH+lbSbIRfsHid5rCbv2S4l9IO8Q=; b=GjRwDQT622kx0/cSUYn+z/ImLpDnzh79+ln0mZbefJZ7xjN4A498zCfD mu4mFFixQlkVXZP1E9rfVw0duckTAA9M70H5yYT9aYTMOMlQBHSIt/sAD FBO6BpyNY6c8U0p90kmVUpcBP7O2HzK7zkz3ic7DPDlCTibZdg41wznlL Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYFAHxbvU9Io8UY/2dsb2JhbABDgx2yF4IVAQEBAwEBAQEPAVsLBQscAwECAS4nKAgGEwkZh2YFC5sgn3OKfSSEHGADlRiFT4g9gWSCbA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,646,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="12861523"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-1.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 May 2012 21:50:15 +0000
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com [64.104.123.69]) by bgl-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q4NLoFBd021065; Wed, 23 May 2012 21:50:15 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.70]) by xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:14 +0800
Received: from [10.60.114.229] ([10.60.114.229]) by xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:12 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CC70080F-2D2B-463A-B3E1-B78F192CA0B4"
From: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <66E2061B-4866-4276-B69A-6FD150D6EB93@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:44:16 +0200
Message-Id: <258174AC-25D5-447B-B9A1-11DE371CACD3@cisco.com>
References: <9850315F-B3E6-4A29-AAD5-B53E6C978F69@thomasclausen.org> <66E2061B-4866-4276-B69A-6FD150D6EB93@cisco.com>
To: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 May 2012 21:50:13.0217 (UTC) FILETIME=[082EB510:01CD392E]
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Subject: [Roll] reminder - end of second WG LC
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:50:37 -0000

Second last call on

> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12


will end May 25th at noon ET, just a reminder.

Thanks.

JP.

On May 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> A first WG Last Call took place on March 16th on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-04 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-09
> 
> Thanks to all of you for the fruitful and constructive comments received during WG Last call, that led 
> to several tickets that have been successfully closed, leading to new revisions of these documents.
> 
> This starts a new 2-week WG last call on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
> 
> The WG Last call will end on May 25th at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list and copy the authors.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP and Michael.  
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <ietf@thomasclausen.org>;
>> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
>> Date: April 13, 2012 11:21:00 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>;
>> Cc: "roll@ietf.org WG" <roll@ietf.org>;
>> 
>> Dear JP,
>> 
>> Sounds quite reasonable.
>> 
>> Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> 
>>> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
>>> 
>>> Plan is:
>>> * Close on the last open ticket
>>> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
>>> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
>>> 
>>> Thanks, have a good week-end.
>>> 
>>> JP.
>>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>> 
>>>> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers.
>>>> 
>>>> JP.
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
>>>>> 
>>>>> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Thomas Heide Clausen
>>>>> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
>>>>> discuss it."
>>>>>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>> Roll@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll