[Roll] reminder - end of second WG LC

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Second last call on

> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12


will end May 25th at noon ET, just a reminder.

Thanks.

JP.

On May 11, 2012, at 2:20 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> A first WG Last Call took place on March 16th on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-04 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-09
> 
> Thanks to all of you for the fruitful and constructive comments received during WG Last call, that led 
> to several tickets that have been successfully closed, leading to new revisions of these documents.
> 
> This starts a new 2-week WG last call on:
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-measurement-05 and 
> * draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-12
> 
> The WG Last call will end on May 25th at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list and copy the authors.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> JP and Michael.  
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Thomas Heide Clausen <[e-mail]>
>> Subject: Re: [Roll] RPL-P2P - status & update
>> Date: April 13, 2012 11:21:00 PM GMT+02:00
>> To: JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>
>> Cc: "[e-mail] WG" <[e-mail]>
>> 
>> Dear JP,
>> 
>> Sounds quite reasonable.
>> 
>> Have a pleasant weekend you too - I will be spending mine recovering from week-long meetings in the bay area...
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 14:16 , JP Vasseur wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> 
>>> Clarifying a bit more … what I meant …
>>> 
>>> Plan is:
>>> * Close on the last open ticket
>>> * Authors will post a new revision of the document, possibly highlighting the changes
>>> * Issue another WG LC to make sure that the WG is comfortable with the new revision
>>> 
>>> Thanks, have a good week-end.
>>> 
>>> JP.
>>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 9:03 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>> 
>>>> Absolutely, the plan was to run another incremental Last Call, on the new revision.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers.
>>>> 
>>>> JP.
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've been trying to follow the many mails exchanged as a consequence of the WGLC of RPL-P2P.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Given the volume of changes to the document, I would like to ask that - once the authors estimate that a version of the I-D folding in all proposed changes is ready - the WG be given another 1-2 weeks WGLC before bouncing it off to the ADs?
>>>>> 
>>>>> This just to ensure that the WG gets to give the final version a good review before seeing it off.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Thomas Heide Clausen
>>>>> http://www.thomasclausen.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Any simple problem can be made insoluble if enough meetings are held to
>>>>> discuss it."
>>>>>   -- Mitchell's Law of Committees
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Roll mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll