Re: [Roll] [6tisch] [6lo] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3 compression

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 07 January 2015 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDDF1A911A; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:15:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4bZMS6PFpHR; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFA741A9118; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:15:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1431; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1420643722; x=1421853322; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1SRL2UQkdU6H1jdDwUF7xT8+ZGuEU8JCxbT1yMN4uQE=; b=I+a0jQRter+UXwvcok8s/G0xGeRgc7jG2QWrQSaHGPlgKFl1/78ei781 lRfDo4JYVVE/21lcCrsgC+5sAv3FBKpZgOv2krcqvJ7NHgNZUNcF/qDFa ursyT86QatfM1yWXnAsReligHGOZCJ/Pg3KH1T4tNk4/gtYxRKA0Rz9tJ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnQFAEZNrVStJA2N/2dsb2JhbABcgwaBKgTEDYcKgQ4CgQ9DAQEBAQF9hAwBAQEEHR1LBAIBCBEEAQEBChQJBzIUCQgCBAESCIgkwzwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXjyodOAaDEIETAQSOLppkIoNub4FFfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,715,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="111087628"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2015 15:15:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com [173.36.12.81]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t07FFKlK014042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:15:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.179]) by xhc-aln-x07.cisco.com ([173.36.12.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:15:20 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks" <roll@ietf.org>, "6lo@ietf.org WG" <6lo@ietf.org>, "int-ads@tools.ietf.org" <int-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] [6lo] [Roll] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3 compression
Thread-Index: AQHQKTccIER4yneI6UuQFsYm6imsn5yyn8j8gAIiyjiAAAQPQA==
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:15:20 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:15:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B109AC@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848AC2314@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>, <CE9445B8-BA8E-4112-B892-6BCDED74D8DC@gmail.com> <23FC8FE6-C41D-4627-99FC-DA51FE5777B8@cisco.com> <97A18603-2934-481E-8859-711B00FB359F@gmail.com> <29592.1420563714@sandelman.ca> <4A5D805B-B73E-49E9-952E-8A4683E20C24@gmail.com> <11092.1420586011@sandelman.ca> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848B102F2@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <14523.1420642741@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <14523.1420642741@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.49.80.33]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/3deduEluCFmWE-g2U_33Ov7Bdyw
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6tisch] [6lo] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3 compression
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:15:23 -0000

Yes, Michael.

I think it would help to take that out of the equation.

Cheers,

Pascal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: mercredi 7 janvier 2015 15:59
> To: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org; 6man WG; Routing
> Over Low power and Lossy networks; 6lo@ietf.org WG; int-ads@tools.ietf.org;
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6lo] [Roll] call for consensus for the RPL RPI / RH3
> compression
> 
> 
> Thank you Tom for point at RFC2663 for "address domain".
> 
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>     > 6LoWPAN HC and the new draft proposals (NHC, dispatch, all apart from
>     > the flow label) are encoding procedures that can be reversed so as to
>     > restore the original packet.
>     > The term sub IP, should it refer to an encapsulation like a vlan, would
>     > be inappropriate. If it refers to an adaptation layer below IP, it
>     > would apply.
> 
> So, again, I think a key reason why the various HC are not a sub-IP protocol is
> because rfc6553 does not create new addressing domains with the RPL
> InstanceID.
> 
> Can we agree that this is not a sub-IP signalization problem.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works  -=
> IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
>