IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 10 May 2017 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27724129C5D for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIcr67u5cjnG for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E9B12947B for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAF920183 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:51:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186A8636E0 for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 12:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
X-Attribution: mcr
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 12:24:52 -0400
Message-ID: <6352.1494433492@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/484AApjt2kDVPXqyKiRZj3LuQCU>
Subject: [Roll] re-organizing use-of-rplinfo document: worth the typing?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 16:24:55 -0000

It has been suggested that in draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-14 that we change
the presentation of the use cases.  That instead of having 12 storing and
then 12 non-storing cases, that we instead have 12 cases, and within each
discuss the non-storing and storing subcases.

Doing this involves moving a lot of text around, so before we do this, we'd
like to get some rough consensus that this would be a better presentation.

Do we need to do the run-through of the Berlin IETF96 slides again at the
Prague meeting?
       https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zdjzlLo-gWa1DEug3zQ7aMqWJ3PDM4Hajt-uAOexynA/edit?usp=sharing
       https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1zdjzlLo-gWa1DEug3zQ7aMqWJ3PDM4Hajt-uAOexynA/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=60000
       http://www.sandelman.ca/SSW/ietf/roll/useofrplinfo/ietf96-slides-v1.pdf


Given that 2460bis has not given us the desired collapse of the HbH option
type as we thought would happen,  upon the advice of reviewers and Area
Director(s), useofrplinfo will be revised to update RFC6553 to change the HbH
type code.  Let us get that text ready, and so the WG can react better.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email