IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] Dissenting technical arguments unwelcome

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 25 July 2013 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E6621F8618; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.666, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qOyR1KWZzbnc; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7E521F84E3; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 12:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A16E20256; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 1A6EE63A88; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DEC63A7C; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAK=bVC_Fdq9=bEg1+_2bqFgV_3EmMQ12vt8_+0mS1coxotsf-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK=bVC_Fdq9=bEg1+_2bqFgV_3EmMQ12vt8_+0mS1coxotsf-g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:40:15 -0400
Message-ID: <23549.1374781215@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Dissenting technical arguments unwelcome
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:41:45 -0000

Ulrich, thank for starting a new thread on this topic as I asked.

I am looking forward to understanding how we can do mesh-over networking
without creating multi-link subnets.

It might just be that we need to always auto-configure /128 addresses on the
interfaces, and use /128 routes everywhere.
That's what my code does in order to implement multi-link subnets.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email