Re: [Roll] RFC6553 ?

Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> Thu, 12 March 2020 01:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nyrahul@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D443A0F97 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zm9DB68grDzd for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255014.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD603A0F8E for <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lr0MUtKcglJoHVu0iFGiY/IqCzaRCBY9KfSmK0fbPHk0+GTx4fV14k2PojYkV+b0q6RnNBlPn06lTwTpuW60cI3rLoMN83H/6aHAhVVF5e+czb3MxIqPWJG9+lp9P1d7J0MxUh4fSaHZEBfTE+jaD+3SQGsofOk4mNfbah7drD8VAjGKacnKngqilPdznvc1s9FrcZh3GHJXVaswpMetDYgtVr0ZgVc2ExrQZkd5il12Fcm7Pfk2zFLe4oojNpPZRkg8X4zR0v/oQ8M/VCEhK1R5WuTiKp+PuWESiSRR50a5ZQ5S+BeFMPWXOw8DHluqHsstAEEIgJ//Ac0utab2Ew==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=41CHEZUgJTmq9bfbMT/cKoJLet66qhHghsYM2EyzoiQ=; b=d1Ha9jB6ABDdVo9lLnqNHm4iK5eGt4tBdAjHhQ3p3wAPXSExvoXsGRSmdkhccEucjoXjoerGq3ePiXK1QIE4D1NJtV9pFiPd424QzZZZqZQO08O1Rb/N+pgJ+LnspR2kIqnGtgTTEwHMUA9GT0MaUA3ylZZ8GK2T522nv8eTzQ/HP4Lhrh+uJCAoef2b1CsuEHTRsswzkjkvnSMjUerhOycyS90Xd9pMHsJ+EoXh5mZBlvW5x48lmOkLU3ZzDz4tJDK/sUQMb8kfoeS/e3Jrr853PQvQ/oBqk7sRo8zo7vs2zKb80kSLjPtGe7DX10ZMLXsuyAt4J0N+ndLSPvjvBw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=41CHEZUgJTmq9bfbMT/cKoJLet66qhHghsYM2EyzoiQ=; b=OF2cfVBOskv3vzKYDxS8af7sTzvi7ZXaC5dlbzWe9fH99UXONSIoE6WLxqHsWAkpBQr77plkJOKnk+HBn2TbiX7Hg3+QjUc6RVyvgFOb+Sf5hF3vhoNGHn77VtLFZY1wKhRYMHAIwmN8cTPjclfJQoK5VYwf3Y699dLWsXAU5q3jzI4Z3l6eRL/M7sKyNqJBwGTLCS+X71f7kTUb4be7jlaNFa9OXbrDbqBBzPKfCzXosVCwDPDo6tw4Hz2rTUUaUjWqLcEJiqQ3ZFReRMHQKx1GL35WiwG7wLCKEcM2dvYNQdRIQvE1doyVp46hDDDTdGG8CCDZlTfuDXTu0N4K0A==
Received: from HK2APC01FT007.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::34) by HK2APC01HT160.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::334) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.13; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:15:40 +0000
Received: from BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.248.56) by HK2APC01FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.13 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:15:40 +0000
Received: from BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a1ff:5c53:dc37:c050]) by BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::a1ff:5c53:dc37:c050%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2793.013; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:15:40 +0000
From: Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] RFC6553 ?
Thread-Index: AQHV+AQYxS5xBcGpFkCp3KZlTDwu36hEJfZO
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:15:40 +0000
Message-ID: <BM1PR01MB40207DA8F29DDB2E771AA61FA9FD0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <20200312002017.GP54522@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200312002017.GP54522@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Accept-Language: en-IN, en-US
Content-Language: en-IN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:977CA6D433F0107954CCF1E34EE46672BAEF7427980B4AF2511020AB815E5D12; UpperCasedChecksum:A0D3DBD008A0958727B607D295360567EF06ABFAFC9C42926001F9F155B46C6B; SizeAsReceived:6760; Count:44
x-tmn: [jF7jTo4uNnqjsCD1Dw/Jetm1QrDJ1JPn]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f34feb5e-f922-4eb8-7979-08d7c622e11b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HK2APC01HT160:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: dcGzUXQynOFxqgUtXSugW7YD40ecYmDwFeRk5WV9QP3xmk+pSHHwi9TcuYW9d3JJ/FIzjid9xqDwCGW3O1XzohGyu6NI8VNWqF03my1CFT5NbyEB31JpBLrPdEXLbuqDyP132GXfFmS2paW0slKlYO6ssQAUo001jfDXz0uHFNewOOy6d1ycrQFPU5L46erUrQGFGoc14ENi/kXPiEXZBKXYdlbUyaHDJ7kSu/wasP0=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: cDPll2KpNEu71uewcQXUpq6HFczV4vgeUD21fOg8t9jN4kUW24mgvOqH2hCT+Vwsdg/37qjIaXmJhXNRpvYdD0vKw33bZOTXPRmsSOySLfeOb6mgU3ea129XmO4WzwkQX1XYM1B4ddP/GZ5zQuDzqA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BM1PR01MB40207DA8F29DDB2E771AA61FA9FD0BM1PR01MB4020INDP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f34feb5e-f922-4eb8-7979-08d7c622e11b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Mar 2020 01:15:40.3346 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT160
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/gxy4s2P6YVnYH1f01NJ-clRJ_uk>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RFC6553 ?
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 01:15:46 -0000


RPL Option (DEPRECATED) [RFC6553]

Couldn't find quickly an explanation for this.

Can anyone fill me in, pls. ?

[RJ] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-useofrplinfo-36#section-4.2 updates RFC6553 RPL Option type value from 0x63 to 0x23. The section provides good reasoning for the update. Hope it helps.

Specifically: In my ANIMA ACP draft i tried to unwind all those RPL TLAs
like RPI and that had me include a sentence about RFC6553 being one RPI
option, only to the extend that we do not want to use it though (informational),
so i hope thats fine whether or not RFC6553 is not recommended anymore
in general.

Thanks
    Toerless

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll