Re: [Roll] WG call for adoption for draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02

Dear all,

I have read this draft before the split and indeed, I find them much more clear as separated. 

+1 for adoption,
Giorgos

> On Mar 12, 2020, at 02:36, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> Kindly note that this draft resulted because of the split up between capabilities and MOPex.
> Earlier the WG had adopted the combined idea of caps and MOPex. However, we decided to split up because of no dependency between the two and because MOPex can be handled much faster than capabilities (due to low complexity).
> 
> This draft does not have any design/rationale change, wrt MOPex handling, after the split.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rahul
> From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Sent: 11 March 2020 09:51 PM
> To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
> Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> Subject: [Roll] WG call for adoption for draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02
>  
> Dear all,
> 
> This is a WG call for adoption of draft-jadhav-roll-mopex-02.
> 
> Please send your comments by 25th March 2020.
> 
> We kindly reminder also that we have an ongoing WGLC for draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-04, please states your comments on it.
> 
> Thank you very much,
> 
> Ines, Dominique and Michael.
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll