Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL

hat off

+1

may be change title from "dao-projection" (very technical) to 
"hybrid-storing" (more objective oriented?)

Peter

Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw) schreef op 2016-08-25 11:38:
> Dear all,
> 
> I support the work on DAO projection and would be willing to review it.
> 
> This will bring value to a RPL based network.
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/08/16 08:49, "Roll on behalf of peter van der Stok"
> <roll-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stokcons@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> Following the ROLL Meeting at IETF 96, we would like to know your
>> opinion about the drafts, presented during IETF95 and IETF96. This the
>> last set of three messages. The adoption of drafts as WG drafts will
>> be asked independently dependent on the status of the draft.
>> 
>> Please, do answer to the three messages before 2 September 2016.
>> 
>> 
>>  F: draft-thubert-roll-dao-projection-02
>>      Root initiated routing state in RPL
>> 
>> •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>> •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft ?
>> •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>> •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
>> 
>> 
>>  G: draft-satish-roll-aodv-rpl-00
>>        Asymmetric AODV-P2P-RPL in Low-Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs)
>> 
>>  •    Is the draft relevant to the working group.?
>>  •    Do you foresee to contribute to the work described in the draft 
>> ?
>>  •    Are you willing to review the draft ?
>>  •    Should the draft be rejected by the WG ?
>> 
>> 
>> It would be nice to know the reasons why you agree or disagree with 
>> the
>> drafts
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you very much,
>> 
>> 
>>  Peter and Ines
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

Re: [Roll] "Charter inclusion: Work in Routing proposals: AODV_RPL - > DAO_Projection"