Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: (with COMMENT)
Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> Tue, 28 July 2015 09:58 UTC
Return-Path: <robert.cragie@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FCB1A883F; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fjaick0S2kSs; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64DD31A7007; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbyj8 with SMTP id yj8so71069926lbb.0; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GYvFsFTXpIYjdJNzFDwRAT4hXBP+8A/bPQkBlHGZZWQ=; b=RuXhopXSFs52UxNjzw1XF/XjGHq59To0hifg3auVcQ6jlW7DnYZHDYuXHAM3gNHeUC k7uRqJP7w+Lx1crqTeoqSdPPNF8HM0Gw1Z9AQOyKCrXZN4jbIHwJySnHKJbANcSctwQ9 ZCiA6uA1NXCbMDXewEIMToGnH8AMHLx1snfgM+AF4/s9gbXlaXmNRYkunBzbGrtFgP6O xcAXxsLou8lejOp6xq5NJYV4XWm4kS19IoTMAJA6oIGmxexIlKxK55o5AcAoj05SVWLQ bLu6071pUhyNgvaHyCtCHvq95A+61mUxRajxUSMCqnCjM1TEkoKdLc7wN1cRqSQiyVrz owDQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.198.74 with SMTP id ja10mr31720281lbc.19.1438077510882; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: robert.cragie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.31.75 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55B7506A.9040004@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20150725140840.20611.18415.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADrU+dK44Gze4k5LKDK-_8HT2n-_=WMOMczk_XyPYOYGybyq2A@mail.gmail.com> <55B7506A.9040004@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:58:30 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jd3L4XFRXXuRd3n_VpIG-CNX0zA
Message-ID: <CADrU+dJNONsyJCoqKcJm7yx=y+O+T1aihbZg8GZ9zE32J=tw6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2b8e6321d47051bec83ba"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/5NF2PfGIVmM0dGbWU5XALxVk8oY>
Cc: roll-chairs@ietf.org, "roll@ietf.org WG" <roll@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building.shepherd@ietf.org, Yvonne-Anne Pignolet <yvonneanne.pignolet@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert.cragie@gridmerge.com, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:58:34 -0000
Hi Stephen, Understood - thanks for the clarification. As mentioned, we did go through the comments and respond and make changes so will be happy to show these to the chairs/AD if required. Robert On 28 July 2015 at 10:50, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 28/07/15 09:18, Robert Cragie wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Please see inline for specific responses. > > > > Regarding the old comments: We have tried to respond to these issues in > > previous follow up e-mails and modify the document in accordance with the > > responses. Repeating these old comments suggests that neither those > > responses nor the updated text have been read yet. Please can you read > the > > responses and updated text before simply repeating these comments? > > Otherwise I can't see how we can make any progress on this. > > Sorry, we're talking past one another. The old comments are present in > the tracker and get attached to the email unless I go through them and > delete them manually. And since they are not blocking I don't spend > much time tracking if they have/haven't been addressed. And mostly I > forget once sufficient time has elapsed;-) In other words, it's up to > you and your AD if you want to consider them or not, I don't mind. > > So you can make progress on this in various ways. One is to just ignore > the comments. Another is to say "yeah, we know it's not blocking but > we'd actually like to chat about <this> comment." Your chairs/AD may > have more ideas. > > But the main thing is that a "No Objection" ballot is just that, I > don't object to this moving ahead. > > So I'd say if there are any of the comments where you think it is > interesting to continue to chat, please just mail me about that but > there is no need to address each one in blow-by-blow fashion. If > you and your AD think there's no need for more chat, then we're done > already. > > Hope that helps, > S. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > On 25 July 2015 at 15:08, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> > wrote: > > > >> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > >> draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building-12: No Objection > >> > >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > >> introductory paragraph, however.) > >> > >> > >> Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > >> > >> > >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > >> > >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-applicability-home-building/ > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> COMMENT: > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the discussion about security. I didn't check > >> if the comments below were handled in -12, happy to > >> chat about that if you want. > >> > >> First two comments are about text that's new in -11: > >> > >> - 4.1.8: "MUST be present" is ambiguous - do you mean > >> it must be used? I think you do. > >> > > > > <RCC>This has been changed to "MUST be used on all nodes" in -12</RCC> > > > > > >> > >> - 4.1.8: "MUST be distributed or established in a > >> secure fashion" isn't really a protocol requirement. > >> Do you really just mean "see 4.1.8.1" ? > >> > > > > <RCC>As mentioned before, this is just introductory. I suggest removing > the > > sentence to close the comment.</RCC> > > >
- [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ie… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… peter van der Stok
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Robert Cragie
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Ines Robles
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Roll] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draf… Robert Cragie