[Roll] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BDD3A14A9; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Cuc475/L; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=AkbPuCd1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNBQyjmSJL9i; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61CB3A149F; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 01:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7444; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583915145; x=1585124745; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=GYjkSi9CbFNN1Eiaxf9qRzHEAZzr+/mdZnn/fdXtvv8=; b=Cuc475/LLUY12AXecku4JVKpu5/AJT3fIzDq3t1aJ+gFnu+4SV0aCqIU htYfbamqnu6UougnnUXPJhswt0I76hwCopp1KhCy9Nt671kWZIcoqlmh8 3HOOqIsCjQFoCxxAlJWUuCD8lWIhZOlMwNpRaGZ2IZQqMeo+cx5n7lg+q k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:IDQQjhSNQTWIM4OmQ90DnwRA49psv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjQmHNlIWUV513q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuDQDKn2he/4kNJK1LGh0BAQEJAREFBQGBe4ElLyQsBWwPSSAECyqHWgOKc5MFgwoDhGKBQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIwoCBAEBhEMCggskOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhWYWGxMBATcBEQGBACYBBAENDRqDBYF9TQMuAQ48nX0CgTmIYoIngn8BAQWFFBiCDAMGgTiMLBqBQT+BEUeFbwQagQ88K4MWgiyWXplUCoI8j0yHPJs6ihmEY5tUAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIhKBRnAVgydQGA2OHQwXg1CFFIVBdAKBJ41GAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,540,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="453908452"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Mar 2020 08:25:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02B8PicF011144 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:44 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:25:26 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:25:25 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:25:25 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ieo/+pDBjtqhKVBtLcLBVXrwJijjp0BN0AABzOskriBG8CEJHETMASQKytU+RjM35jNIdayjUTkt6JBoT6kRVFWLpTN282r8vSbcOJBIy/Fd4Jr+PwuAY1gR/rquNYJ8dU6f6C+j6bS5snf9qdAQOxL/2Zxo9LP5WGY7FH/qD/40bp6NgFozTHt73uLjO3BragpRubC4QhXGFnPLIWGCowdU4Ps/zSdOE/UH9NzziaxLCgNq98ou9CWXAOpSxdI6Dy1/CU+XoTsaS09SOXstUho52jdfy+xOiUPS0ld49P4w8IAZJqL5QVCRg5EQOUPMSjlJpii3LGnQ3LGIYfNkLg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=bi0yujOO0OuUjyBrGMAcxQaoN7buW8wmGzhUHS1LV+I=; b=iJcPIMiyfiz+mALEFGb6mUTpmHDtVKw4SAKEW3hlzUA9SlDRrXh7hgccKQj0NB9/AaVI2tbG/9c747WsaLiww0fPeJ6yVrosI9EYbLjfVMZpJ77FI68iFk27/3FKehEYvOskvLANg8qeINJ7ZKTXP9/KtCj2kPyyWL59y1vdHazlX3Vmr6uWRFVGp/mfTNXuXgLSjWa+rydHYC4VxH9icwnU1JWA4vrfGUe/kJ3ScOoqXNc4M6zmhOj7VLPh2jPRuQ3bS1cYjfs4DA/NyzRcdDot4Gpx5TpJqP3CQIQvau+MWn4D9IhZw/lS+oQUX0U25mPJ+0hVqbX7BhHzNJqdgw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=bi0yujOO0OuUjyBrGMAcxQaoN7buW8wmGzhUHS1LV+I=; b=AkbPuCd1OQQ1/KFAOccnhOEU0zs2bH1HNFgHp00j/jtpmjUz89IkEzv0H9Hn/iGXrV8fkUpNQeDKH+I3IEZu4zvZ1WSgia66GEzHf68yQLTUAratYn9aFurwPgqkNhWzXRTjahoC0uvNFSByVw4y21bdppvHuGt/tGokoSVvDVs=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::31) by MN2PR11MB4192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:13f::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.17; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::edba:2b0f:7341:2c24]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::edba:2b0f:7341:2c24%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2793.018; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
CC: "suresh@kaloom.com" <suresh@kaloom.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com>
Thread-Topic: Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves
Thread-Index: AdX3fJ5pUtv4terQQmaCk9uJXDOjTQ==
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:11 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:24:40 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB35651792CF4ABA5A79E36430D8FC0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1008::102]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1f8d4c4a-2273-4a91-524d-08d7c595bde9
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4192:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB419208CD5AFDEFDF2FCDFC76D8FC0@MN2PR11MB4192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0339F89554
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(199004)(54906003)(16799955002)(186003)(3480700007)(316002)(52536014)(966005)(86362001)(8936002)(76116006)(8676002)(4326008)(6506007)(7696005)(81156014)(81166006)(6666004)(110136005)(478600001)(9686003)(55016002)(66946007)(5660300002)(66446008)(64756008)(33656002)(66476007)(66556008)(71200400001)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4192; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: iG3xb1Fz1G8KDi4nqCEapsgkOSa8ZZsblWnjXX3hNle5sRGyHArUx+Nsni5ynJmKKihxPJSElcch4fk7dR5bD0/v36+w1dQTKHO89rlCXIhZ4zp2rGa3cBdsLf4fmW7XMbqHPW2NQTFWZX46t/7NWBJA/X1GT4X7VD1w6HV0Sok=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB35651792CF4ABA5A79E36430D8FC0MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1f8d4c4a-2273-4a91-524d-08d7c595bde9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22.1619 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 3k7TLTOTjElxHsPb1FYxBbn3fFBa3Bfxcq+OF0KbkJh8ycEI0OucvfWDccdU0vy9bEMQCKQlxvQQ0zRMQHZwTQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4192
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/5dfapbV9qjpIK4gEjUcsqKfYqE0>
Subject: [Roll] Shipping RPL Unaware Leaves
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:48 -0000

Dear all :

As you may know, draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves is blocking the whole cluster C130 https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C310 and we want to ship it now (WG milestone: Mar 2020 - Initial submission). The issue we have with it is the fact that we allow encapsulate the ARO status in a RPL status and we need bits to signal that.

To free the necessary bits the proposal on the table is to reduce the possible values for the ARO status to 0-63.
This can be done by a simple IANA action that can be taken from draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves but we wanted to ensure that both ROLL and 6lo agree with the proposal:


12.1.  Resizing the ARO Status values

   IANA is requested to modify the Address Registration Option Status
   Values Registry as follows: The unassigned values range is reduced
   from 11-255 to 11-63.


NB: this will free 2 bits in the Extended Address Registration Option and the Extended Duplicate Address Message, could become handy in the future.

Is there an issue with this that we are missing?

Pascal