[Roll] New proposed charter

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Fri, 11 December 2015 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C0A1ADBFA for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rzsUWX3tD0pj for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632C51AD0CF for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbbcs9 with SMTP id cs9so71731915lbb.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=X6YH7CNipPtNGlu3ezRNIglxHDxgGRndCwaLMpcTOF4=; b=qYpycK56h7zOp3o6k2gVfNHkkAJek70ebHCUspGJekf+tUuj4SaNhYM88V1Km+DqYH BlQLGN/7JawxEj997oYlj4I22ERGvYg61Sm61ZSZrA/GHEPPj/5Lu9CwL8897PIKmLf5 Uf0MHk8Y3BRxkEduMiP3l3Fvq3bSb3GY5FejrVjtMJL5nAw3De/HOMGuHrmRpGlnkRkV 00YQOQM5K2db5GOzbySmNI+JEWxRzA8Qz1JbQL4VK9RocuSAFvnLJm0yblHL2c84cuhz ZjvWNfCZwTkDvimpOZR1Va/AsOgrEiBcuTtkhxtx2wpB3z2vEyeUM90LDdUD47M4ZsRl 0Tiw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.77.194 with SMTP id u2mr7851892lbw.62.1449846075559; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.151.78 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 07:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:01:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUfYLXN7z5b3UtXbs9a_JQjCfBpJGrihQru+k8wTFsOTbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: roll <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3d4ca5016ce0526a09868"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/69YzxhkShFdul2OfqfQtt-6JqrM>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Subject: [Roll] New proposed charter
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:01:19 -0000

Dear all:

We propose the following text to replace the current (much longer) charter [
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/], please let us know your
opinion about this.

If you think that other specific topic should be included, please let us
know as well.

Charter proposed might be:

RFC 6550 was published in 2012, and has seen several successful deployments.

Over time, additional issues have come up, including issues in the data
plane of when to use IPinIP headers, and how to compress them, as well as
the standardization of a mixed storing/non-storing mechanism.

The WG is chartered to look at enhancements and maintenance to the RPL
protocol, with the aim of eventually revising and advancing RFC 6550 to
Internet Standard.

Thank you very much,

Michael and Ines.