IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] new text in the turn-on draft

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7D11200C7 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:31:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKffJT1hN4w9 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CECD1200D5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id i31so6326259uae.13 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:31:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=niUqIVL3jgzh8yj7xys1sHlQfrRbDwSErqNrTd8+j4E=; b=bH25K2VmeGVHyGIyxJKkHq/ZC606MFYWeeIQUt6sCuYGtsonpbHnnchiH8+j5j7XSo bZAkRChKsWBy6WmsSDaGe8uPEEPxZtKYuSUIXfxEWuWOvWsj6tEqulfNM6hPIZ2JmT4c DCpxDnizCIxR1Q8PZW1NjGsdYKjYidbCFKCLb4Se13KK+vrW3WQeoxBFZseygXrxbzd/ mvaYy1+POT9NFoq4yRI4VvpOdhIb9BfTBGenk0CzZT3h7Hb/pGYqbA+gjRA1BKLbgTYn 7ziCt3tcQViHET5QwDwVSiFLxyfktIaCRt57GAAnwV13i2gJVwpXK7idxtyhjl8hXTJL pUkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=niUqIVL3jgzh8yj7xys1sHlQfrRbDwSErqNrTd8+j4E=; b=eekh+LDgdZf682PIR9sHyskZN+lCoBP8ixUxErl76uYYZ4xZaoz4N3a+PVRVO1uDUe vuiu16lKYe96ddSl1Q6dQygmkjBZ614nfC9gGSWZjKRFMWMX8nltOsHTigU33/5BJjo4 sbSXAWKRRn+epFKNTZbi2+TBwdD2BPEoluAukYZ+IYux9Fh6qt4ylAN4HTKQiAQT1PaP eKRWOB5KGj8E7syKWM9eOfQybXe7aTCBKc8A8pJSNZgvmV6zc4cYyba4uWU1R3C8iMtX CTwesibRU2Kgce7IgTnSV8f6k6PZI+EyN2fpnlRxbwIvpZOr8/+I3hQx6CVqh5fDYlRR Mb7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUNORDzcHDR94TqZxxXxl2xaOaK72Z9YCoMKL/2JhcJAq7oW5X4 DvSpsWq3p2T/NusupV0RsuPp1pt9ppeohgTjgb3KWVjU
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzM1doJ4ydEhEAiSs0QgcSt4rFCjHqSswgJdU81lJlHFMFzXukPYwqytoyvYVP1m75ARDxM+LoPg2t4jh5fgSs=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:661a:: with SMTP id r26mr20588740uam.59.1574159513054; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 02:31:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35652EC9BA05858C4918A342D84C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35652EC9BA05858C4918A342D84C0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:31:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp3aPx8qowXFtEQ5sf6RTBsw_rWEDTd2FsQyyAy5YePVwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/6BPzJjif8EzB1PfPJSpZdDtWZLI>
Subject: Re: [Roll] new text in the turn-on draft
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:31:59 -0000

The text essentially frees up the bit for RPLv2 (unless needed).
Works for me.
Thank you.

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 14:18, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
<pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> As discussed this morning we need text to restrict the ‘T’ flag to be defined only for RPLv1.
>
>
>
> Proposed updated text:
>
>
>
> .  Updating RFC 6550
>
>
>
>    RPL defines a configuration option that is registered to IANA in
>
>    section 20.14. of [RFC6550].  This specification defines a new flag
>
>    "Enable RFC8138 Compression" (T) that is encoded in one of the
>
>    reserved control bits in the option.  The new flag is set to turn on
>
>    the use of the compression of RPL artifacts with RFC 8138.
>
>    Section 6.3.1.  of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP)
>
>    in the DIO Base Object.  The new "T" flag is defined only for MOP
>
>    value between 0 to 6.  For a MOP value of 7, the flag MAY indicate
>
>    something different and MUST NOT be interpreted as "Enable RFC8138
>
>    Compression" unless the specification of the MOP indicates to do so.
>
>
>
> Does that work?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status