Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-roll-terminology
Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Fri, 11 January 2013 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=716e5d5b3=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92AD21F8984 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:00:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eOAeEeQhGGX for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip3mta.uwm.edu (ip3mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.192]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE0921F8976 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:00:46 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8EADka8FB/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABEhjm3VoMRAQEBBAEBASBLCwwPEQQBAQMCDRYDAikfCQgGEwmIEAylGIlEhhCBIos6G4MVgRMDiGCNKoEcjy2DFIFQNQ
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C4F2E0D7A; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:00:45 -0600 (CST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHCL3ahsyCcI; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:00:45 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta02.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE772E0D75; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:00:45 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:00:45 -0600
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@philips.com>
Message-ID: <1682836180.361975.1357912845498.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <031DD135F9160444ABBE3B0C36CED618B5EFFA@011-DB3MPN2-082.MGDPHG.emi.philips.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-roll-terminology
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:00:47 -0000
Section 1 of RFC 6554 defines RPL routing domain in an informal manner: "A RPL routing domain is a collection of RPL routers under the control of a single administration. The boundaries of routing domains are defined by network management by setting some links to be exterior, or inter- domain, links. " It will be good if the terminology draft could include this definition formally. Thanks Mukul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Esko Dijk" <esko.dijk@philips.com> To: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, roll@ietf.org Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 4:51:24 AM Subject: Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-roll-terminology Dear Michael, all, here is one WGLC comment: the draft does not yet contain the definition of 'RPL domain' which still needed to be added. (Outcome of list discussion ending with this message http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg06561.html) RFC 6550 uses this definition so it would be useful to have in. regards, Esko -----Original Message----- From: roll-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Richardson Sent: Friday 21 December 2012 18:42 To: roll@ietf.org Subject: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on draft-ietf-roll-terminology The document https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-terminology was always intended to be published as an Informational RFC along with RFC6550, but it fell between the cracks. This became obvious when other working groups tried to reference it. I am starting a Working Group Last Call on this document. We have had significant discussion of this document in 2010 and 2011. Version 07 was posted, some minor revisions produced version 08. Given that there are seasonal holidays starting, I am setting this WGLC to end two weeks from Dec. 31, so for Monday 2013-01-14. I do not believe that there is anything controversial about this document. If you have comments on this document, please post them to this list. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works IETF ROLL WG co-chair. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/ _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
- [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC… Dijk, Esko
- Re: [Roll] start of Working Group Last Call (WGLC… Mukul Goyal