Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 13 August 2014 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453AC1A0936; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxKR4SvenfMF; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BBD1A0415; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1868; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1407948684; x=1409158284; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=UAg8jz6yjyMjUYPdUDe+doeVg49RkBjAEPoQNaAXxvw=; b=IBATIewe1AGLBI9F1rCwGLdUfaSKo83oEH3lQvRtnJkjjXSoRvhKKH09 dI/4JMmxCEPKXkNKqnNJgIPnjI3gUOjiNtK3bHlQNh8A+OKg/swyELkqk sqe6OzmKdOF+4prY87aqx7rxUkpkQPsaCK5rW2zgiU1SR9SDKva1brNDU c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAESX61OtJA2K/2dsb2JhbABagw1SVwTNHgqHSAGBFBZ3hAMBAQEEAQEBawsMBAIBCA4DBAEBAQodBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIiCYDEQ3BCw2FRBeNH4FfHTEHBoMpgR0FhhCEU4Y6hCaITZMngWMdgVxsgUg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,857,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="347231243"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2014 16:51:23 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7DGpMhU031948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:51:22 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.56]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:51:22 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
Thread-Index: Ac+wDejPSf6MzwEzQpSdG5woHqaOoADOBvRXAAsYswAAiNKGgAANrl6AABapBoAAAvlzgAA40uRw
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:51:21 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:51:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D3BF04@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D189A1@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <406B5D64-4F0E-4E71-BC60-A113FB367652@gmail.com> <46112F69-05F0-4E50-A808-287B06AE8E5F@cs.stanford.edu> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842D1A9FA@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <057EC9C6-07FF-409B-A3BC-3348A5F43AB3@gmail.com> <53E534E8.4050304@gmail.com> <F7618DE0-7217-46C2-93A1-CE050085E7AB@employees.org> <53E926EB.9000505@gmail.com> <CAP+sJUfDyNa=t=+C=QXy8MmvG9rAUxA0mTsXL7xSWAeLUR1qcQ@mail.gmail.com> <C95BA1B7-A7B7-43BD-8E23-8FFDB2DD79ED@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C95BA1B7-A7B7-43BD-8E23-8FFDB2DD79ED@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.49.80.52]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/6QM0zvceCRwndEk98Wh0VfvMme8
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:51:25 -0000

I disagree, Carsten.

To save all the bytes, we need to update the 6MAN rules and allow to change a non-zero flow label, be it only to reset and elide it when coming from the Internet.
More in my other answer to you today...

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
> Sent: mardi 12 août 2014 10:40
> To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
> Cc: Michael Richardson; 6man WG
> Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC for draft-thubert-6man-flow-label-for-rpl-03
> 
> On 12 Aug 2014, at 09:15, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > This technique saves bytes
> 
> Again, the straw man at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lo-rpl-
> mesh-00
> saves the same number of bytes.  Actually, for common cases, it enables one
> additional optimization (saving one more byte) that is not available with the
> flow label hack.  (On the other hand, due to the way RFC 6282 works, the
> flow label hack saves one byte where both it and ECN are in use and the
> common case does not apply.)
> 
> The disadvantage of the RPL mesh header is that this approach is not
> available outside 6lo networks (i.e., networks employing adaptation layers
> that use RFC 6282).  I'm not aware yet of a use case where that is a problem.
> 
> In either encoding (RPL mesh header or flow label), it is probably a good idea
> anyway to unpack the compressed information back into the RPL IPv6 option
> when leaving the 6lo networks.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------