Return-Path: X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090571200E3 for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 00:06:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVx7QXE0lJ6V for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 00:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AB912001A for ; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 00:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s71so11508385oih.11 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:06:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Ik7V4yMLtDx6Do+TLUymKpfIw6QXa/IL+DEgJ60+W0I=; b=HZW93SQAmePPD/tCd6qbawDlzOqbLu/8jUhNQC4PNXJXvyIDOU93sljeipyTQaVaoL u/vZbyCZ9V3NNO+cyzVgMtG18ghL6wH9y+rxwBqnHUwvmWfaziSVKhCBrSEEdOfooZfQ fzrSbWW5y1GJv1KZhq5edgkbkux/u3OdwdK9bhpDCYvHnJMYlEKCCA+wGJ2Md4+6YlsE 2Swt3Hplonw+pcB3BCbFPuzxnn8IbXitC42YjxgzN/vwvPHwKM3W6JGxiYsj8MldJwag mgv0pmRnVLv/2MOIsM/obt1BVWKfkxZdsu5TTny/1lHxJMQbSGC48FRbrN70HsMvafGp FYzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Ik7V4yMLtDx6Do+TLUymKpfIw6QXa/IL+DEgJ60+W0I=; b=IhiVbBvGoI6h6y64PMMPj1rpSIqJBcg0v0x4MJbxWN9u0dC5tDAr6SP+PXLWDvESVh 8S/fjgdQm5JV1QkY2Fyjqz5q6GXuTQdv0uSBN23N5aIUUSK+e7PfLDHQwOv8ayDYeFTQ FiZXbfExonGWQh8UZwpBd5mUKa45dH6QWAh/p5WeXfePRvK5nloLN1mYhZ32XApHctvr T5ftf3ttu6RqDBty01F2W+z+5re7/XwJPKXGPyq9D/c49X2mL8aifXevBJY0zE0po/2R wNz9xyijpL2QyWBiwd0/k07sGlBkT6uVUIJSl5qym7l77zC8hB3R9i9zhqMeM0q6m3Y1 FpZg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdy9Dr0+FyHRFa6G8voXrWE091yRLaavyEmLgMzy1Gd/mjmGW+ eZc+fUZuq9cuCsqk/UWMLwOBKD8qBZxAyAk+AF76Eg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyY7y7CB5uYOU+0TxgNg/IeZetsrfQ0bForWJd2oG1I3KfYEdBiqcH7nEaOnq/yVPD53s57Wt98VzN55J5gQP4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:58d6:: with SMTP id m205mr361943oib.32.1572764762965; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 00:06:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Abdussalam Baryun Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 09:05:49 +0200 Message-ID: To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000030c9d05966bd590" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Roll] Adopting turnon 8138 X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 07:06:06 -0000 --000000000000030c9d05966bd590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I hope this needs discussion, please note that the authors need to reply to messages if they really communicating with the WG for adoption. To WG Chair> please advise now and future authors that want adoption to respond otherwise the WG is directed by private/big companies and not by IETF. AB On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:54 AM Abdussalam Baryun < abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think it is the right approach, why using the DODAG configuration > for compression? this compression turn on/off is not for the DODAG > construction but for packets. I think we should separate configurations o= f > the RPL routing standards and of the packet compression standards. We may > add another configuration option per DODAG or another way. > > What do you think? > > AB > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < > pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Dear all >> >> * https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03 >> is a >> simple draft that completes RFC 8138 with bits in the config option to >> enable turning it on in an brown field. There=E2=80=99s no black magic a= nd it would >> be good to progress it in the background rather than forget it. Could we >> consider adoption? All the best Pascal * >> >> >> >> >> * _______________________________________________ Roll mailing list >> Roll@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll >> * > > --000000000000030c9d05966bd590 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I hope this needs discussion, please note that the au= thors need to reply to messages if they really communicating with the WG fo= r adoption.

To WG Chair> please advise now and = future authors that want adoption to respond=C2=A0otherwise the WG is direc= ted by private/big companies and not by IETF.

AB

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:54 AM Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think it is the right= approach, why using the DODAG configuration for compression? this compress= ion turn on/off is not for the DODAG construction but for packets. I think = we=C2=A0should separate configurations of the RPL routing standards and of= =C2=A0the packet compression standards. We may add another configuration op= tion per DODAG or another way.

What do you think?<= /div>

AB=C2=A0

<= div class=3D"gmail_attr" dir=3D"ltr">On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:34 PM Pascal= Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

Dear all

=C2=A0

https://too= ls.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-roll-turnon-rfc8138-03 is a simple draft= that completes RFC 8138 with bits in the config option to enable turning it on in an brown field.

<= u>

There=E2=80=99s no black magic = and it would be good to progress it in the background rather than forget it= . Could we consider adoption?

=C2=A0

=

All the best

=C2=A0

=

Pascal

=
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
--000000000000030c9d05966bd590--