[Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACTIVE_FORWARDING should be not recommended
"roll issue tracker" <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org> Mon, 10 February 2014 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E121A0865 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wpw_5u-Gdfde for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B21F1A0868 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34170 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1WCrSk-0008Ao-Ki; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:03:54 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: roll issue tracker <trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: roll
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:03:54 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/145
Message-ID: <067.79caf3d48565d14915d46ba9623f2ab0@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 145
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org, mariainesrobles@gmail.com, roll@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+roll@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: jonhui@cisco.com, richard.kelsey@silabs.com
Resent-To: jonhui@cisco.com, richard.kelsey@silabs.com
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACTIVE_FORWARDING should be not recommended
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: roll@ietf.org
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:32:50 -0000
#145: The same value for PROACTIVE_FORWARDING should be not recommended Thread: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll/current/msg08473.html From: Axel Colin de Verdière <axel-ietf at axelcdv.com> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 01:26:50 +0100 - I don't see why MPL forwarders on the same link should have the same value for PROACTIVE_FORWARDING. It is now RECOMMENDED to make it so, but I don't see the rationale for this recommendation: on the opposite, I think it would allow some forwarders with less power restrictions to be more proactive than others. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-roll- mariainesrobles@gmail.com | trickle-mcast@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: trickle-mcast | Version: Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/trac/ticket/145> roll <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/roll/>
- [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACTIVE_… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACT… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACT… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACT… roll issue tracker
- Re: [Roll] [roll] #145: The same value for PROACT… roll issue tracker