Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup

"Georgios Z. Papadopoulos" <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr> Tue, 19 November 2019 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E6812092B for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5vxNNnjKAi2r for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr (zproxy110.enst.fr [137.194.2.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FBF9120921 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8623F822E6 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:18:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id KYm5fFqV3IP9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:18:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900C822E4 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:18:17 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy110.enst.fr 2900C822E4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1574173097; bh=mhZJxOxtDuwLToqIonxZrwHBmG5dJgzNvUOoVdLFcl0=; h=Mime-Version:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=coK+azERPxjLKPAGQPTMeqGqsZGicNRVUL2KUpSELLadmLG5AY0XJATHOfYLfEwJ6 BvyiE781JIjT+zYQrZKXbM+KW48H0S7Az7kBnCaBAbfxO6WzodUj5lokkRnxOeiwh7 nmPaDXOzaIhCHj3UcjY1Elc/cWF1PytCUfkS9DZE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy110.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6UUxeEeLqWGe for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:18:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.0.73.55] (unknown [132.147.98.37]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 714938229E for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:18:16 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: "Georgios Z. Papadopoulos" <georgios.papadopoulos@imt-atlantique.fr>
In-Reply-To: <948305BB-331F-419B-A9DE-82234688DC4B@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 22:18:11 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BE561478-7155-42FA-A947-83392701BB9F@imt-atlantique.fr>
References: <CAO0Djp20PRZnzTO4pU0KPmiCPcdEiitJYLdoLWOmOkgj6-vzmA@mail.gmail.com> <948305BB-331F-419B-A9DE-82234688DC4B@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/7E1N_6ziamDPEn4dq8vLJedAeXY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] MOPex CAPs splitup
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:18:25 -0000

+1
Georgios


> On Nov 19, 2019, at 22:09, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I fully agree with the split, and suggest we quickly handle mopext as the infrastructure for RPLv2
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pascal
> 
>> Le 19 nov. 2019 à 18:46, Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> During IETF106 we discussed splitting up MOPex and capabilities,
>> reasons have been:
>> 1. MOPex and capabilities are not dependent on each other
>> 2. Capabilities draft may take a while for WGLC, while MOPex can be
>> shipped sooner.
>> 
>> Please let us know of your opinions.
>> 
>> The following is the link for the separated draft.
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jadhav-roll-mopex/
>> 
>> Reviews are highly appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Rahul
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Roll mailing list
>> Roll@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll