Re: [Roll] WG Adoption for turnon-8138 at IETF 106

Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AAB12004F for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:57:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bo8eUb4pi97 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBAF120045 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:57:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id k8so140580ljh.5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:57:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=axiefOj1xdmbd7sSzKKzAsGzlUl/B8kEn52kmTjlL6k=; b=SBnWeLyLNQYkOfvpsLxKuElDBwEOXV1/Zt7EyujRBhvXjmHnjnPEUxAgcMi9tUpzsy sL5oD1oUHqQLN4BC41fkXq3jZh5jmmIqXd6Gnk0g3ulVAKTU3xc3xNugjhUUmAPs/yuu boFQiBUbYZ604Jw1NyCPL0PD9Yftt+8dABIjvknBoiTAj9A2nFJAcyfPrwLGnrfjLOpU 8v2JDc5otVs84Wz+ODHN62Uh2p2rWnGQLSOYpp/LE3KLgae57mJLOr/byiE5rX3jYSnX vVmcqVv7Me8Xg5vQ89cybKG6u11UwGJavzdstaQSg35McQ0atOTY69+CzGHnXiTB3zyB 9FrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=axiefOj1xdmbd7sSzKKzAsGzlUl/B8kEn52kmTjlL6k=; b=bbj71Tq89iA1rIhoGaDlpeNy7enEHnXeWA7f3b9IHaBeOHvdSw4JRl0y02cyVVEzjH rQuyP3zjDxdBaPlxCaLfZsky5eUs6TuCW9cvDeqboim+1qz5968k8wEYL+FQyNa0y+Pb U6yfI4WH/9L5GbMqA4o+nhHsVLCLobPCLUPWfZxhO1D07Y1g/9Y4FneyeNl7s+v8qkiR vrQycsNbrlA7qdYbuTs0iKshvGwPQBj5KYkEKoXy4oyxFX9gLQv5a+63RG2YuNAR07dU knJol7cbWKZI/WmXJMIxKN9kIm6vZROhQZwTjDuG2/uUTq66QFKHNlHSFn5EE5ShpfSL l8YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXOp9Kgn5tVG5TeMjVQm6X7crkuUpxcOo381p2VqfdCKx+9PgP QGNERZPIO+FubyIK0sNbarGr8CWKosF5IPisykVb/q1CI60=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmIR+ktMqgRcAuYRywmb9ArL5K24jlFKVw6w0/5ziX7jMI2mPbYFR3N+CeT/K3ocRMQPjx+MtznohY6ndwY5A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9cd8:: with SMTP id g24mr436450ljj.243.1576630619918; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:56:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP+sJUdv2CDXOtf52J8K9+mXf2_y04o5tFW0_4RhzgJ+0+Ec-g@mail.gmail.com> <8458_1576085645_5DF1288D_8458_93_1_DA16E503.6D4F2%dominique.barthel@orange.com> <CADnDZ88xjB3ukMMhfBoohRgkLPcAoy-9+6h5H_4BqGLxdnFmDA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88xjB3ukMMhfBoohRgkLPcAoy-9+6h5H_4BqGLxdnFmDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rahul Jadhav <rahul.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:56:48 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO0Djp0O3MuiO5nG6TxH8_oETj8HPWJxFk8Ls9cBbgQShEBnCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/8aGzi0JZnxl94WJ1vE7AnD71Kp0>
Subject: Re: [Roll] WG Adoption for turnon-8138 at IETF 106
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:57:04 -0000

>
> Adding to the WG record, that that draft is using a reserved bits for configuring the RPL DAG, and it is using it for configuring the data compression. The argument on the WG list with authors was WHY that use of reserved (important question), IMO they did not answer that but asked for another proposal.

I was skeptical too about using a reserved bit in DIO Config option
for handshaking a compression flag. But the proposition of using the
reserved bit for MOP<7 made sense to me. We certainly can't set this
flag in DIO base object or any other place in DIO. The reserved bit is
part of DIO Configuration option, and the indication of compression
flag also is a form of DAG-wide configuration. Thus it fits ok
principally too!

Anyways, it would be interesting to learn of other ways from the WG.
8138 is useful and for it to be put to use in existing networks, such
a flag/compression handshake is necessary.