Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ89F0fwoOfiDODDm_tuQVTqg-CTDT013KsHzdeEydKU3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:04:59 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <456B8E96-0AB0-4F18-B8A3-601EBAFDDEC4@tzi.org>
References: <CAH=LnKQDPf_-Tw7BODF03PKYkLXjLCSR9RAtd-x9-ha-c80Hrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <037472BD-E257-4561-8A07-988039DD4641@nestlabs.com>
 <CAMsDxWTHrgDLopT1Oz93xAuCyimAADmudBj71PTiHgCAj28CPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842DC5072@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
 <2992BA1F-147C-4652-B713-D2F31F45F74F@tzi.org>
 <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD842DC5639@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
 <0FE1C6E1-EBA2-431D-A2DB-1C3874234827@tzi.org>
 <CADnDZ89F0fwoOfiDODDm_tuQVTqg-CTDT013KsHzdeEydKU3qA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/8lgYVdO8SXgKAUe3xmYcOfPOzKI
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>,
 Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>,
 "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] [6lo] Fwd: Comparison of 6lo-rpl drafts
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>

On 17 Sep 2014, at 12:11, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> =
wrote:

> Why not?

RFC 6437 explains what flow labels are and how you can use them.

> If this WG decides that we want ROLL's solution decision then we may =
do cross WGs discussions or cross areas (this in not done much in IETF =
because still IETF is not flexible or ADs are not promoting that =
enough).=20

There already was a common WGLC between ROLL and 6man.
Initially, there was some flexibility on the 6man side along the lines =
of =93if you really have to do this=94.
Once it was demonstrated that there is no actual need to hijack the flow =
label, the sentiment shifted.
I see little point in repeating this experiment.

> I think we need to clarify that 3 proposals. So why you think we are =
doing it quickly.=20

Because the 6lo WG has a track record of getting things done quickly.
(Also, I=92m only aware of a single active proposal, but maybe I haven=92t=
 been paying enough attention.)

> Why you think that it is dead?=20

See above.

Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten