Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes

"JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com> Wed, 22 August 2012 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jvasseur@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E9E11E80DB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcYftzPb3mgg for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0C11E80D5 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; l=1645; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1345616106; x=1346825706; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=k0/PYEFh5IQh7Z+BgT2pCFZ4R7S68539xo3ECTT+g+A=; b=PnXHqr/1yJQRLkj/esDgRzW7laeyBz7VHVeMyY75LOHIAC98Kr8P2QTy siVvtWSuOyOJfcmiZnfWTvBUx1VbBrddv/o2JFVCvGT51fqhWmu+S/jza CZFK2WWTxv4QYe5F/TgJDT9jiddGJUn+W4JKaYvHQ0Qp29IgZl9vg9BNe Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAPh3NFCtJV2d/2dsb2JhbABFDrpUgQeCIAEBAQMBAQEBDwEnNBALAgEINhAnCyUCBAESGweHZQYLmSCgOQSLCBqGImADlVKOLYFmgic6gWE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,808,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="114079520"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2012 06:15:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7M6F5fZ014371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:15:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.209]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:15:05 -0500
From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: roll WG <roll@ietf.org>, Omprakash Gnawali <gnawali@cs.uh.edu>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
Thread-Index: AQHNgC14aerYJYORe0Sa2/SEM2k1rg==
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:15:05 +0000
Message-ID: <B7828579-4864-4CBA-A999-808F394D543F@cisco.com>
References: <CAErDfUQV2E5H66k9YjRSGF8RmA=xhQzrDwpyTRBJ8WQUZh3diw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAErDfUQV2E5H66k9YjRSGF8RmA=xhQzrDwpyTRBJ8WQUZh3diw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.95.148]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19130.004
x-tm-as-result: No--42.329900-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <DC3BE80CB79FCF4089697B03C63136D1@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Roll] mixture of storing and non-storing nodes
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 06:15:10 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Omprakash Gnawali wrote:

> Dear ROLL WG,
> 
> John Ko posted a draft a few days ago about how we might accommodate a
> mixture of storing and non-storing nodes in a network more efficiently
> than making one of them leaf nodes. Searching through the ROLL mail
> archives, it was clear at the time that there was no use case for
> having a network that has a mixture of storing and non-storing nodes.
> I wonder if this is necessarily true if there are devices from
> multiple vendors. At the time, it was also speculated that the mixture
> could also introduce unknown problems and no one seems to have a
> working solution. The draft describes one of the problems that could
> occur if we try to form a multi-hop network with storing and
> non-storing nodes. That is a concrete first step towards getting a
> handle on the challenge of having nodes with different capabilities in
> a network.
> 
> Your guidance on whether this is an important problem worth working on
> or the work is heading in a wrong direction would help evolve or stop
> the work.
> 

JP> I cannot agree more - actually we even have a partial to the problem during the initial design phase and
the WG collectively decided not to mix storing and non-storing in light of the added complexity. I would also
appreciate the feedback of the WG on this, and not add complexity unless this becomes a strong requirement.

Thanks.

JP.

> Thanks.
> 
> - om_p
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll