Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman Discuss on on draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 01 June 2012 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23ED111E8116 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d4F+z5LE8cla for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC0611E8117 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so1673014vbb.31 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=sstJrnXLOvXy4UKrTL+u921mCYH3HTzSCkDgMhZ3q5Q=; b=f5TKMkpottb/sd+Z0mUjRPmOjCOZwrx5dXsMbO2f0EW1sTVp+wmmG3cQmDYf1Iv6RW Naf24aMtHy2Por2Dtd4TI44O4JnN7adJw7ILa2uZbhBnvOuB0ASKCSdTvU3u0nwPjxsf zdIweZAgOHxcXn9wLPSOjpjCJotDj8PIDfBMMmP/ZYgKC+51mucNFwignMQA9NSVpm/G JPfuog1r5tywBflUvamunoaVjcokz3vyc6DYE6dEb1Lq5wW0oclvvsAVnr15JskcoT2/ f2B4u3gA0mluIHP9viCiCPAtd9nSNhyjQxpcZxCGqyJ+DCQ6qKCPXkJ9cs001he7NHRm thBQ==
Received: by 10.52.100.67 with SMTP id ew3mr3605302vdb.36.1338578371872; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-318.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d20sm4389487vde.20.2012.06.01.12.19.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <17114.1337959052@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:19:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A571424-7E15-40D3-B6BD-A25E42DD13B5@gmail.com>
References: <25665.1337180676@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4FB3C7CB.70709@innovationslab.net> <CAErDfUSjWgcgTt2oLDAFO-b4YUdqqfyUnrOC7AukggSCQNLNqQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FBA58CC.9040109@innovationslab.net> <19650.1337713406@marajade.sandelman.ca> <593C2D52-E780-4D75-B535-7F2B147642A0@gmail.com> <23542.1337782756@marajade.sandelman.ca> <B007D59E-A49D-48C0-B8FD-8EA9C10E4D8D@gmail.com> <32356.1337806435@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4FBE8CCB.2050504@innovationslab.net> <E0C9B8D6-1947-457C-86D8-A5C3FB74FEC8@gmail.com> <17114.1337959052@marajade.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] Brian Haberman Discuss on on draft-ietf-roll-minrank-hysteresis-of-10
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:19:33 -0000

On May 25, 2012, at 11:17 AM 5/25/12, Michael Richardson wrote:

> 
>>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> writes:
>    Ralph> OK, do I understand the fundamental issue correctly: the
>    Ralph> assumption that there must be some form of installation
>    Ralph> process to adapt the device to the specific deployment?
> 
> WG: please disagree with this assumption of mine:
> 
>>>> Yes, that's my understanding of what current
>>>> manufacturers/system integrators expect.  Remember: there is
>>>> layer-2 security stuff that also would need to be initialized
>>>> before the smart object could even get on 
>>>> the network to see any kind of announcement.

The ZigBee IP spec expects that any ZIP node will be configured/provisioned at manufacturing time and there will be no installation process when a node is deployed.  The spec mandates the use of MRHOF with ETX as the selected metric with a specific set of operational parameters.

- Ralph


> -- 
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll