Re: [Roll] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10

Alvaro Retana <> Thu, 15 April 2021 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320A83A2AF8; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uG7ZYxMAgLbP; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30EE03A2AF4; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id sd23so29782615ejb.12; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fuyVvCgQD9orvMJnsU77s1mwzeJKy75chysHx2V1LPo=; b=tfSkpzHb0122BL3Y+KwD8ek448xHlw1LZYMr7/MpD7F6iRRWzporjR7JBWS4IniDaF X1EQAv4ZY/7rFxFUJDZ/RaA1WMF4VmIGkmfNxgMQSn4ula2hF5q510GhhFN4zZnMga41 OjR9jwy2f3tEf62HT3ADdmkoRRKZjPTaIyhHCIN67OtGAiHG8FL58BRBUR9voiLUhDCx h3oSENiCYmjOv6ClZm4rVMNFktOdK2Wa7PytMGpwGHhnX0A55zMxm4wT8nJ8UJ2OvkDP Up3ZmoVk3wIk5qih7Vnbs9hG3bkVFcklT6FnSuOZutFcNWZX/2B0B2dEKoDi/jYW8nzn 8FWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fuyVvCgQD9orvMJnsU77s1mwzeJKy75chysHx2V1LPo=; b=TE5QKSEwI+v6a7KDYKpuiTsuyOs1eHYjHlvfXZx5p9rPa03076VsHzr5qA5CIkqVyt KfPNevt7X1pI14ZmXJZQZQaaxhqPajd1MPnI6bxyR6JrpewtkJgYjMar9CaWOuQ+AMS7 sNCvlynmF63wyYLvGaRYgZwkjXwR32INjxa3bbfrw1rg0aWZEo4HmLHoQs4OF75EUH7t 8HvOIl/J58fzuccNj5LmNHAAVHL93iXi7gWQvl55kvhtN8xk38cqnPGn02PJcsWetHGJ QDadPNetUHyUl7ElAOQKLqkpNzRux/7CNSpu0Fh3fJ/xUhXSWEhBRWsnErepwe0bk3oK OVbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530w+Wub8st0WYQKqtIKxbdyhJ3mj0hMuFsQOHu7aQ5f6ILWbpkt WenX7lUQebASSZsiRuySVGz3oY+i7HmxkUjGyVI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr4KLEk9mIQ5oaMnqCgq4QNYmxjSCcg6eZqMBY47+nhhjAAI/ENWzPZVIgoQ9h7+ZLfaLkifZHIDWYk3HLIrw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:134d:: with SMTP id x13mr4971088ejb.61.1618513041823; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:57:21 +0000
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:57:21 +0000
Message-ID: <>
To: Peter Van der Stok <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:57:30 -0000

On April 15, 2021 at 5:55:57 AM, Peter Van der Stok wrote:


Hi!  I hope you're doing well!

> In general, the document is well written. By looking regularly into RFC 6550,
> I am rather sure that I could implement the protocol. The question remains
> how this draft relates to RFC 6997. When the WG decides that this draft
> replaces RFC 6997, then it would be good to copy some text from 6997 to this
> draft, because RFC 6997 is more explicit about the use of RPL parameters as
> specified in RFC 6550 and presents more explicit motivation.

As you know, the roll WG considered the question of replacing rfc6997
as part of my AD review [1].  At the time there didn't seem to be any
strong interest in doing so.  Do you think that has changed?

Thanks for the review!