Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Michael
>     > 1) Can I submit as draft-roll or do we need an adoption call there?
> 
> That's a good question.  My instinct is that since the adoption call was
> actually done in ROLL already, no.  Drafts can just be adopted by chairs.

I'm sure you meant adoption done at 6lo. And I agree with you entirely. An adjacent point being that we have a lot of cross participation and that ROLL members actually participated to the call at 6lo which was heavily advertised on 6lo, ROLL, and 6TiSCH.

> 
>     > 2) Draft -6lorh is stable, ready to last call IMHO. The critical
>     > decisions involving formats and header orders are probably already
>     > taken. What may be still subject to discussion and that is of specific
>     > value to ROLL is bit mapping to protocols or things like that. Since
>     > we are transitioning areas, it would be good that 6lo expresses a
>     > blessing of the current shape and form so that unless there is a major
>     > change, we do not need to recirculate the document again through
> areas
>     > to go to IESG. Based on the fact that 6lo adopted it in the first
>     > place, will 6lo be happy that the ROLL WG completes the editorial work
>     > on RPL relayed semantics and ships from routing area without handing
>     > back the result?
> 
> So you are perhaps asking for a Consensus call on the shape of the 6LoRH
> solution from the 6lo WG?
> 

Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done and happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel the consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate the last call to ROLL?

Take care,

Pascal