Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Mon, 21 March 2016 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A2612D6BE; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTDfJmNAvRps; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B8412D6B7; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.212]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id YXkz1s00h4aYjWA01XkzQs; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:44:59 +0100
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:189f:612e:48c2:876a by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:44:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:44:59 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <AA9B8E10-A759-478D-B40B-7D670A5A4EB5@innovationslab.net>
References: <BN1PR03MB0725DAF0801633B06EB4018958B0@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <0a3e093af6aa4648abc0ed798d92ae5c@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <8928.1458305306@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <11622bd30cf747a8af0c3a9710d3af89@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <5250.1458330404@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <0188F630-1D0B-4254-AB8F-7F339A2D1382@cisco.com> <AA9B8E10-A759-478D-B40B-7D670A5A4EB5@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <52d4a1ad9ea4f417eac00ff17d456e7e@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (2BtpihYGfHlP/X0H/a/AVekFhA4sfANZ)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/A38B9MhLEuxATNUQ0GAmkvYziP4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:09:24 -0700
Cc: 6lo-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch@tools.ietf.org, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, 6lo@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch@tools.ietf.org, Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>, jhw@nestlabs.com, roll-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] routing-dispatch (6lorh) change in ownership from 6LO to ROLL
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:45:06 -0000

Happy to collaborate, but still dependent on Ines point of view.
I would suggest that I-D is submitted as ietf-roll-.
That does not need to take time; only the existing draft with a new 
draft identifier.

I prefer to start WGLC during the meeting in B-A, having explained the 
situation.

Anything I am overlooking?

Peter

Brian Haberman schreef op 2016-03-19 00:13:
> Works for me as well.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) 
>> <aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> That works for me.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Alvaro.
>> 
>> Thumb-typed and autocorrected..
>> 
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Michael Richardson 
>> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Yes, Ideally I'd like to see it as 6lo saying, well, we're done and
>>>> happy but prior to IESG please review it from the ROLL / RPL
>>>> perspective to ensure completeness WRT to the aspect relevant to
>>>> RPL. Maybe all we need os the chairs telling us that they feel the
>>>> consensus exists at 6lo, and that they are happy to delegate the 
>>>> last
>>>> call to ROLL?
>>> 
>>> I think that would suffice, if ADs approve.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> Roll@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll