Re: [Roll] RPLinfo review

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Tue, 24 May 2016 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E4312B006 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC3f9fv8eRSJ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E266B12D1EB for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.217]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id y9HH1s00g4h15BW019HHup; Tue, 24 May 2016 11:17:19 +0200
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-65-44.w90-0.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.0.40.44]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 24 May 2016 11:17:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 11:17:17 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUePiV+_Nd+f-H-x_zNoTgkS0Cqe1rq7qD7ie_H3MyOorw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <09c3e3fc17b5de9b7366d226c034da28@xs4all.nl> <CAP+sJUePiV+_Nd+f-H-x_zNoTgkS0Cqe1rq7qD7ie_H3MyOorw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bc96b8913fff031fc1f41eedfdb6bee3@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (B96/f9VODHnw7VY8PJ5XTNoQM0u07wn+)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/BRP8yjrcmJKlicM6GZEMZFSo6TY>
Cc: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] RPLinfo review
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org, Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:17:23 -0000

> 
>> I also did not see a mapping of flow from one RPL instance to
>> another instance.
> 
> I do not understand this. Could you please clarify?
> 

A node belonging to one RPL instance sends a message to a node belonging 
to another RPL instance.
This seems possible in Figure 3, with 3 RPL instances?

If possible, it means an additional use case.

Peter