[Roll] P2P-RPL (RFC6997)

Cenk G√ľndogan <cnkgndgn@gmail.com> Tue, 31 May 2016 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cnkgndgn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE43F12D600 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.692
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.692 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.506] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0AT3GM-Mr8W for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9687A12D7CC for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n129so113058219wmn.1 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZIuyqfn9s8b4r7PerQJysV7seE9O/U3r0rFFV/VUiLI=; b=dqXqvFPpJLDNPp882jXnPEXbMSwanuImVQlaNlA/s+nQSkLvcv3TiSK3ob+GCdCk8b ZjA+7QnjFappQUUINuJCg6h96MdtWsjLYnkh0oHN1J5zJ1usvhU2lZDtXaoWs0SfFuxw LpMI/M/jEf9/Bk9TthRBXPfKhN7wGy/EJK3V6fB8HlTdTIJvg7LVSfb1cspJNA8psPxR JdTIWQyGWAZiXcvg3Aeisp1EchzSJzBbK90omt5e29hc0c/RwQ3uwsrvd7cn/Ou/Cqks MA14bYQzPTLADLHrr1Fhdoxobi3S3TpHPvnB0CcXLqIrJbet4buI/qQkMTEE6ecAY2OQ yZWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZIuyqfn9s8b4r7PerQJysV7seE9O/U3r0rFFV/VUiLI=; b=RzpMHDQt92D/Hzac15fgr+yW40vLBT96mAQdVxvyHm5xqkKi0FO/KGigUuUO2s6BDw wOejk7epE2SbbecP0LZfDGsn2aOXiEe0GYKK9K26rf2aYHHMge9mnhBO8EZ5EHWsj+Eg hgIV46nqPkHmNaTmjNMtLcZFBOmzgHlQXDf+mJGhpqAeA8GgfsB1P1+1gLSsF4XmA0ZS Lb7ybM/ogdghMXfEHfsgGmvurpmt+MKciRn624Qjflwokp9RdfUPGtJRior7Bavoj7jF GV22rng4Bi3opbQIYQx21gmVFmU0ma2WzuwLp07r0n4thdF0+PKvo/IrioorsdvGhLyI 0SPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL0EKE6MIdlTuAKnRuifO76w1xr1ttpUadH4W2Dx/eVRGJNRzU5u8wHIVN+vxmoFg==
X-Received: by 10.28.21.204 with SMTP id 195mr6474061wmv.64.1464708253103; Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.92.124.3] (z5c7c.pia.fu-berlin.de. [87.77.92.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm29139659wmf.22.2016.05.31.08.24.12 for <roll@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 May 2016 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cenk_G=c3=bcndogan?= <cnkgndgn@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e2870d79-7a11-af02-8e9f-4d8474903553@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:22:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/Bv9rLOEzwGCXh_kDjd_UbfrWQH0>
Subject: [Roll] P2P-RPL (RFC6997)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:24:17 -0000

Dear Roll and authors of RFC6997,

I would like to bring to your attention that I provided an open source 
implementation
of P2P-RPL (RFC6997) a while back, supporting a minimal set of the 
specified functionalities.
(Currently, only supporting the reactive discovery of hop-by-hop routes, 
not source routes).

The implementation resides in RIOT's [1,2] network stack and I plan to 
continue working on / fleshing out
the implementation probably in late summer.

As I also implemented and contributed the dissector to parse P2P-RPL 
control traffic for wireshark,
I would actually like to test my understanding of P2P-RPL against 
different implementations.

Is anybody aware of another implementation that I can test interop. against?

Thanks!

Best,
Cenk

[1] http://riot-os.org/
[2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT