Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD11120873 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:31:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=R+67Lr0o; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=gGVgMv6K
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NbEECz40SpsE for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D9A12022E for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:31:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=23080; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1574778669; x=1575988269; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=heuwEEH0+hUjU5Wy0wFwzJB2e4ik4cPTchVfoA37YIQ=; b=R+67Lr0oXa2FL2R1ZTOUUWBkvaDJNVhmPyd1GUtXMQfiWxTSndOdIhzP qomPFtByJptBQ07t5meNsygeNzcrrNtK5Z6O0k/Rvu82lpSIzYI2D25yn FjhuswGu4FHjmG1RdlHG3JqzMnN5ylyS48zLHJQVeOqdS28Zx2ySau+FM 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:GBG/9RRo238hUfPMfnWklXuBONpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjQmHNlIWUV513q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAQDBNt1d/51dJa1kHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgWwFAQELAYEbLyQsBWxYIAQLKoQrg0YDim9OghGTIoRigS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQEYAQwIAgEBhEACF4FfJDYHDgIDDQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthTcMhVIBAQEBAwEBEBEKEwEBLAwPAgEIEQMBAQEoAwICAiULFAkIAgQTCBqDAYF5TQMuAQIMp24CgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgTkCDkGDBRiCFwmBNgGFGoZ7GoFAP4ERR4FOfj6CZAEBAgEBGIErBRkeDQmCWjKCLI0sgmuFSolIjw8KgiyHHY5Ugj9zhnePdJAKhnqRVgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBPxoFLYFYcBUaIYJsCUcRFIZIg3OFFIU/dIEojkcBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,246,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="665568174"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 Nov 2019 14:31:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (xch-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAQEV4AA019517 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:03 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:02 -0600
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 08:31:02 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Yp4T6JD1XNDC5q4JUy+ig9cTQdDxO9rbC+yx06Ec4mJiyRt/2dyo+qrPvtASqW129Elgksgv1OYcpU+y44G0eBXH+Zxey7bRzMe5KchNl9wyeFMQeF33c/tcYoO3dtof3/BiqVnXN0AA9bLUliFYmz/x1NoUGU2K0U9HOrUX+A4iWXbhcm4uFUrlA7oRv0IGxTN9mfNa3x+70Vz9vy8X3QQ1wpGdOimhFLY6YC+b73LVAHS9DvIce8OwRxH8MPA/nH5/0cEN+cCXAJp3eXUtzJWPSF3tHLqByZuQt+hsqv73010Z8hNRYOtvQZ7OXTJkbXF6cIX4AICBUPVUGOPjMA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=heuwEEH0+hUjU5Wy0wFwzJB2e4ik4cPTchVfoA37YIQ=; b=SAtHtyYko/Z4tnCzsPaOWM2D9BSPHAuNXnwZnGJck9TcrnjEDhMjTHigNIL0JRyNkyfBUKwWoWTZVYJC029kRDuRpVC5KWNW85EHqZRIzl3UcvC70CfatSpJxdkimnDkCkjmKxNfVXv56QwDywxftQYueA2xJP0om6elMBCmstORMrGXHf8ojSJx2gU6In04L8YMcN8Xdtz2dRcmUdF/SFFLmLdHsa88tu9hW76wahbTwjB84JpFbgaFpuKzO+qSpeSN7J6233VUNtSboREzbeRAQzqgIikez/1g23pQM5q2IaYlKvZykYGJ21HERqFC7gQkVdeL6tcsppB3zQfluQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=heuwEEH0+hUjU5Wy0wFwzJB2e4ik4cPTchVfoA37YIQ=; b=gGVgMv6KcGHh51AV9Tpd4ysQwqH/2f74kavKe4fInvBwurAu/Oj5nSPUvxrgKnwWZCQ9poPrK8CU7OfT0TqhGgU3PIitxu0g+P7DnyoGe6Betp2nJUu7xcRkIH7Q9iAV4BLg0zXAtRXCBz/FCaqoF20OGugYN/Jcfo8DZTLazRo=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.250.159) by MN2PR11MB4029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.181.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2474.21; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:00 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3037:66f1:dc79:b564]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3037:66f1:dc79:b564%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2474.023; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:00 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVpGVkXobK5qdhG0OdbsPUc6qF1KedgkpA
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:30:50 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:30:23 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3565F261BED62B3A70FEE564D8450@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <157477212600.13715.10647534303499379032@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAO0Djp1K=_6DwAQ31+Y8raVkfBP7=YobaQkOzrtBCB9Da3Fd0A@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB35651EEACA6CB142CB57D1F4D8450@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAO0Djp2kX52TfrwJSzuBB2bOLoE46WvJOw-XJ-9D66U-nqXeuQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO0Djp2kX52TfrwJSzuBB2bOLoE46WvJOw-XJ-9D66U-nqXeuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:44f3:1300:319a:d677:8020:aa76]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 66c07035-3846-48ce-9435-08d7727d4275
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4029:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 6
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB40291DA22DB9350374CD807BD8450@MN2PR11MB4029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0233768B38
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(53754006)(22974007)(199004)(189003)(478600001)(6666004)(966005)(256004)(606006)(52536014)(66946007)(71190400001)(71200400001)(186003)(6506007)(66556008)(53546011)(236005)(64756008)(6436002)(66446008)(46003)(11346002)(446003)(76176011)(14454004)(316002)(102836004)(86362001)(4001150100001)(99286004)(7696005)(74316002)(33656002)(76116006)(6116002)(2906002)(5660300002)(14444005)(8936002)(81156014)(81166006)(66476007)(9686003)(25786009)(55016002)(6306002)(229853002)(6246003)(66574012)(54896002)(7736002)(790700001)(6916009)(8676002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4029; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: em+QBZW6RmCG4g1V4qzo4sDvThcDstOo9OfZ1HT370LZg/qM9FCl/6hYHStAdK7NdNEoeR3ocXaCb2YlZmjSTW+Arw+vLDpc7ayN6RLCb5+Wbxz7UyY/ktKAYbqxq9nTO8fjqWqCzJs+O2uUntVPQNHTb3OxPlfzRlL//j9UknFO9CfV86mDWQrNnlCvK8h61gI9PRJQ17iH8AeTTdC49QHzJVqRmlM9Z04QDmctf44YhV8aeLwA1M8BagY8XYLjl7vTnVYTCCh0LhB4xwfhsMPXK2ajvE9ohkx0Kvz5yEtX0TyTZBBhkbXQS1SwDOQAjjnCNNGArUlO5qwmIlUXeFmVGr6Hh/2m05xeBrZKThRHAXzZQfDdkc6wI1x+MQAgLeZXdmp+dAKJGp+FbbmqrNmhcOMqaj3V9qLfbds3dwhQDvJidQUA9mPGqItCS8GDnvea+3/AKFHEa8Yq12CBfly+g3Kj+WVFYPGtttbllMY=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB3565F261BED62B3A70FEE564D8450MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66c07035-3846-48ce-9435-08d7727d4275
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Nov 2019 14:31:00.5736 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: hGpLecMYudEFhqC6jujE99iFI7GEihfgTdykaxxc4MrrzsAfRRUehdoOIpQMsSL9JU5r9xJQ/oekDMTC2Z1clQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4029
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.17, xch-rcd-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/CwiaZjUaWLKz63w-sSf4-BG1UHY>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:31:12 -0000

Hello Rahul :

I mean that if the spec says reset trickle and I is already Imin then the timer already operates within the bounds that are expected so it does not need to be restarted. Now if I was larger than Imin at the time of the reset then it was operating out of bounds and needs to be restarted to timeout earlier. Same if K changes, e.g., by configuration. The current timer operates with the wrong parameters and should be restarted.

Makes more sense?

Pascal

From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rahul Jadhav
Sent: mardi 26 novembre 2019 15:25
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt

Hi Pascal,

On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 20:56, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hello Rahul

I believe I undertand what you want to d but the text below is really unclear to me
“
  Implementations MUST not restart the trickle timer to the
  instantaneous value of I which could have been advanced over a period
  of time.
“
[RJ] ok. But I could not think of anything better. May be I should use asciiart and explain with an example. What do you think?

What I thought you’d write is that the trickle time needs only be restarted is one value I, K has changed, making the current run incompatible with the setting.
[RJ] This is unclear for me. Specifically "trickle time needs only be restarted is one value I, K has changed"


All the best

Pascal


From: Roll <roll-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:roll-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Rahul Jadhav
Sent: mardi 26 novembre 2019 13:47
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org<mailto:roll@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03..txt

Hello All,

The update contains clarification regarding Trickle timer reset handling.

Regards,
Rahul
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 20:42
Subject: [Roll] I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org<mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>
Cc: <roll@ietf.org<mailto:roll@ietf.org>>



A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks WG of the IETF.

        Title           : RPL Observations
        Authors         : Rahul Arvind Jadhav
                          Rabi Narayan Sahoo
                          Yuefeng Wu
        Filename        : draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03.txt
        Pages           : 18
        Date            : 2019-11-26

Abstract:
   This document describes RPL protocol design issues, various
   observations and possible consequences of the design and
   implementation choices.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-roll-rpl-observations-03


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp..ietf.org/internet-drafts/<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>

_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org<mailto:Roll@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll