Re: [Roll] unaware leaves - graceful shutdown of attached-6LR

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 13 April 2020 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1553A17A6 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=fwZBNRjc; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=upInX0je
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzKzTmhjVk7Y for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB7A3A17A3 for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5349; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586790859; x=1588000459; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=PBxj4+2m1UVeb7YaRgNCriHv9J5e2R/H9QkxOWrn/Cs=; b=fwZBNRjcfGbMNue6SgFhnpP1g6SZbAVXH4LBJnXhBhR7zJAKzffMetga 3qtRERIs/1SnU2kxDueDi4GlEJu9yYCUFgP9g0XksdAP98zHflpKOW6jM ofz/Z3FNywasAZ7vrYLiYydEA0IXGS6pR0MwkZIkIg4iIAmudYsQaGOlc g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:6MpXxBIuBGl1SN1KStmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeBvKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXFXnLOPgYjYmNM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B+EQBbgZRe/5tdJa1mH4IigSUvKScFbFggBAsqg1xAg0YDimlOgWyTaIRggUKBEANUCgEBAQwBARgBCgoCBAEBhEQCF4F5JDcGDgIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFcQIBAwEBCgYRHQEBLAwPAgEGAgQ+AgICJQslAgQTIoI5RgQBAYF+TQMuAQ6TAZBnAoE5iGJ1gTKCfwEBBYJIgkMYgg4DBoE4gmKCQocRGoFBP4ERJwwQgh8uPoJnAQGBS4MsMoIskReGCopEj28KgkGJZ41oHYJTmVOEYKc5AgQCBAUCDgEBBYFoIw2BSnAVOyoBgj5QGA2RFoUUhUF0gSmOMgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,378,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="478001297"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Apr 2020 15:14:19 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03DFEIA0009692 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <roll@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:18 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:14:18 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:14:17 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 10:14:17 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QK7lswQ+Az1YdgOg9ZVZUyFmylj7Nrjmb+9ZLWGDLECgDc6EnAYnavQ1stPCq2JZ5c9q80j0nopF8QY9GTbP5HJsgwTn6C8I0P+J5WmgNMIolR0sx9NcKZ6ltUW85tFxrzkGX0XH1Uy2KQ4tK1DXMZXWABe1yYqGlFuG18Z3nkz0dl4gRl87ic9SCgGnptBsXWdg5Q/tKpcAPhiSPt5BxeDdXidKnOkYZyjTwVao+QZZCdVLaw2pbHx53VcuN5CSVO7X11XSRxHnTQA+nz9viSIR7vMrD8luBRBkoBu2UMlUZ/0g3UjJT8Up72+8h8cABfBNOnHyvGrif6WbsffmLQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PBxj4+2m1UVeb7YaRgNCriHv9J5e2R/H9QkxOWrn/Cs=; b=cOXiBQndGrnkGVo559L+Pab2VJoh9yhGMfU9J8bFE0zNheKCaRp0Pxo2baHd1fup70l3pOcw29xHp/N7ykkeDvqqaPxilytLWjGLsVJAlHvAJS3zenDgJOBOF1LQUMSKBcBNz81c4dftKTFylYN6uJmun5XoQU7y/s1fprprxQW38IRyGiNEqZYKEqoIcY7ak6JaClbSf58h5VPbTERnVVOpCfkGevvbXTaqKCbAoHLHfSf7btTRy2RPRwmRsgR2Nms5b25A9mRxcJlcDPbbuAV/mVVQsDwiMHBh+huSrA7clKHJjrfl6FJsDzxHuuFm03h9CWVNJCT48fLFRosP8g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=PBxj4+2m1UVeb7YaRgNCriHv9J5e2R/H9QkxOWrn/Cs=; b=upInX0jeJC2XCiefq+Wv3lgAoMn6f8a53I2wH+mnSsTpYNTrdXeFeeBYjR9XXmnI7NIaG8xyDtrgwucBxV2gZPCdP8JFWUY37daEIX+3CxJML83RUxjTBSKV0wVN52REb2GXqmiqZiOslh19GzAliRi4P9EH7zpI2qvVD8VKxaY=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::31) by MN2PR11MB4679.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:26b::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.17; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:17 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::113b:3127:ef12:ea7%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.028; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:17 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Roll] unaware leaves - graceful shutdown of attached-6LR
Thread-Index: AQHWEZQvbgNuDRZQpEGmjIYHLkz6MKh3KT0I
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:17 +0000
Message-ID: <43981634-330F-496C-AE8F-CB4423448F3D@cisco.com>
References: <BM1PR01MB402069255ECA6D35B53B8BC1A9DD0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BM1PR01MB402069255ECA6D35B53B8BC1A9DD0@BM1PR01MB4020.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pthubert@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a01:cb1d:4ec:2200:48f:4693:9f88:e275]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 09b1e609-1af4-4d68-d394-08d7dfbd558b
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4679:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB46796D593B77CDDF0526FEF3D8DD0@MN2PR11MB4679.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 037291602B
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(396003)(81156014)(966005)(8676002)(66574012)(6916009)(2906002)(86362001)(6486002)(6512007)(316002)(2616005)(5660300002)(36756003)(71200400001)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(33656002)(66946007)(66556008)(478600001)(76116006)(91956017)(45080400002)(186003)(6506007)(8936002)(244885003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: OMJn27TNwu92iyg6GGAsUI530DgUwGo+318f/6hNGyseJU0vQUESVyc8dyuo4Hq2wUa2WM+blZ1gupmHFrQKmaa84I+iU+e+V4BEpBiy8VM/XFleQ7cBhlb8dVPDlfAS1Pb4haTxtRiEAqKkiatyoTDR0shjz692ChpmAXKYtIqEzGriKUp8Q2U1sTdrynVLRYzWafC9m8JSATYIPVVUZg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_43981634330F496CAE8FCB4423448F3Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 09b1e609-1af4-4d68-d394-08d7dfbd558b
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Apr 2020 15:14:17.1575 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: K0dyUwxdtOajQIIc7H4pEzShRSV1mtLeu0jqWA0EMpPSLhdfcOfe+/IQNNtLS0r3ywQCgS8E9BusG/bIIv/rGg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4679
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/CzFJeFkVw-UlOX-WaG8lwh0HvNg>
Subject: Re: [Roll] unaware leaves - graceful shutdown of attached-6LR
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:22 -0000

Great point Rahul.

Normally this is done using a final RA. But the RA is broadcast so unicasting a NA with ‘R’ flag off is a great idea. This is the exact signal that this router does not serve this node. Lifetime 0 would indicate that the router removes the NCE.

Status removed indicates an error. I’d rather use status 0, lifetime 0, ‘R’ off. Don’t you think?

Keep safe.

Pascal

Le 13 avr. 2020 à 15:07, Rahul Jadhav <nyrahul@outlook.com> a écrit :


Hello Pascal/Authors,

In the event that the attached 6LR needs to gracefully shutdown, it needs to inform the RUL(s) to detach and possibly move to another 6LR.
I believe this could be done using NA(EARO, Status="Removed"); from the attached-6LR. Can this NA be multicasted if the attached-6LR has more than one RULs attached to it?
Is this correct/allowed? For RPL we have route-poisoning using which a 6LR does a graceful shutdown, but the route-poisoning is not applicable to RULs.. I believe this should be clarified in the text.

Regards,
Rahul
_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll