Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt

Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> Thu, 21 March 2013 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=78581f61c=mukul@uwm.edu>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0028F11E80BF for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWMOqrEtH3sZ for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip3mta.uwm.edu (ip3mta.uwm.edu [129.89.7.192]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3E711E80BA for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEALMgS1F/AAAB/2dsb2JhbABDiB+9F4FugxgBAQEEAQEBIEsXDxEEAQEDAg0ZAikoCAYTiBQMoWCOVYkuiQ+BI4w/eykSBoIngRMDiHeNbYEfj2ODKIIK
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F92F120CCD for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:07:22 -0500 (CDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVWvglUB26zf for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:07:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu (mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu [129.89.7.177]) by mta03.pantherlink.uwm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58281120CCB for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:07:22 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:07:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1658041537.46549.1363878442228.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <24467.1363877184@sandelman.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [99.20.249.193]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.15_GA_2995 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Win)/6.0.15_GA_2995)
X-Authenticated-User: mukul@uwm.edu
Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:07:24 -0000

Hi Michael

>My opinion is that none of the things changed affect real use 
cases that people currently deploying care about.

That is my opinion too.

Thanks
Mukul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Richardson" <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>;
To: "Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks" <roll@ietf.org>;
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:46:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Roll] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-roll-p2p-rpl-17.txt


>>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>; writes:
    Mukul> Hi all

    Mukul> Besides a number of editorial changes, the new version (-17)
    Mukul> has the following key changes over the previous version:

Thank you Mukul, for persuing this process with the IESG reviewers.

My opinion is that much of this should have happened in sight of the WG,
but there is some changing IESG view as to how to do this.

I'd like to ask the WG to think strongly about the changes that have
occurred.    Do they affect your current or future usage of P2P?

If they do, then I think we need to talk about whether this means you
will write an enhancement document... reminding that P2P is going
forward as Experimental.  Likely it will switch tracks in 12 months once
there is some significant deployment reports.

We are in IESG review process, and we aren't doing another WGLC on
this.  My opinion is that none of the things changed affect real use 
cases that people currently deploying care about.

(and also thanks to the other authors)

(And remind that we a WGLC on mcast-trickle, aka "MPL" aka "Mipple")

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>;, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/


_______________________________________________
Roll mailing list
Roll@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll