IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-16

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93FD120072; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tu0UX9WYLbpU; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA2D12001E; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id g7so476wmk.4; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G6295p2z2PJjEMKE/3AIMRcGCytlGuelNGoQ1QKFuvc=; b=SOd2XfouwCQh8HznIai7mxiu4BZkEtz9JU3tn3uhlUoTIpkoX8v8RbrzeAHs5EPYC2 mu4BQwUhdpWukUmks4ygYpBF/UskEgJYD8lW0m4ktSGQ6YbEcp1iUL+eB8nbMjtQgNPq Erwup/SYUgWzPDAvO77jjUnFOCaP+3Q4TmjucgWaOLR+W3OsGOgQJRXWXYtT5EFgAm0R Tn8MrcHWSCPiD8AN59SsuPx+JYdLf8MYmMNWwq8WtBNzV+NrCHr3GiKvEpUrnG90/V+E XzkQsVF0NMRd+BMprQ8QONQPV+MaU+ZQgooTaUOBSIIDKPCtUYXX6+s8AsWHpbrfLu3x vGCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G6295p2z2PJjEMKE/3AIMRcGCytlGuelNGoQ1QKFuvc=; b=tt8dRGIy8/HN1qnq1dzDf+41Y81thuiOiKaAzvF270gEUboduOthjSFJRsgqurZBUV AQHAvOEBcE3mjtVVR2VmGaXZ6GTP70qFC43k8nDM0bYar3jKpqTuh6MpqLXvtNbZ1j5G yKEzPRy0cn0TiIp20U5MBLsjhOLEHIG0f3QTsxvr5FV9XVx2/Gt0tJGkuU5ehAwFgRlE 2swLyqSzP+hepYkn+Faj7jg29hcOAStTSCm201bcG8G/zBqkQw3/9uYj+AgOxxEkL9Nk oU5hFGQbtA1gXmOQD4G4p4IRI7CC/sUafj1e5hU5nSUx98pQzyLK0AUZmxO+4oGDrpHp l/HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVr1nEPi8XeMJ/cB1dLN1eo1dbEYaEcq3qmrLHSvE+UbYuovY4 GTLnM3AFvaWC2C3krVHtiEftFbaOHHGqRe46hpA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQBffpSWoCgO/MMtghw5szEKLn+GdTlO9h+w03bGkKgoGsdgSFKLjuHIFGUIhHQu4Gg1l5wNsI7E2UhD/pxQE=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c924:: with SMTP id h4mr6464749wml.143.1572386995822; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:54 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB356591018987E7D4FA6215A6D8610@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMESswgX8YynN=tehXDMg+suOiiaCTpnoP9LxoH3orG06_Trw@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB3565181C2DDC7A3FB7DFCB2FD8690@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsz_MJSC+Sx5hPsTFVufqEGUYjuTJFt7pJs7mut_7nHRxA@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB3565998D4CD88FF786E892AED8650@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxBriytQmDELLgOBw4zL8EWKbPKf0i6gztTbuvHDBxWZQ@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356591018987E7D4FA6215A6D8610@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:09:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswv7rj56RXsV-OWcoDJUf0wDmUpPdAqo1Ev5udzEHVdeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org>
Cc: "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, roll <roll@ietf.org>, Peter van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055e4d5059613e057"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/DD5p_FT4Pzgg8-jPhghPaVkQwxw>
Subject: Re: [Roll] AD Review of draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-16
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 22:09:59 -0000

Hi!

I’m fine with the changes proposed to draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao.

I want to see the WG reach consensus on the changes related
to draft-ietf-roll-unaware-leaves.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On October 29, 2019 at 5:52:13 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) (
pthubert@cisco.com) wrote:

 If you agree with the proposed line above I'll make editions and come back
to you for more comments and/or approval.

v2.1.22 | Report a Bug | By Email