Return-Path: <B10623@freescale.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id F2B2621F86E3 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 01:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.367
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231,
 BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EKN2g1KT-HI3 for
 <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 01:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com
 (db3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E93A21F86D7 for <roll@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 01:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail58-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.231) by
 DB3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.84.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
 14.1.225.23; Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:23 +0000
Received: from mail58-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by mail58-db3-R.bigfish.com
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED12120317	for <roll@ietf.org>;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI;
 H:mail.freescale.net; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 1
X-BigFish: VS1(zzc85fhzz1202hzz8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3hd25hf0ahbe9i)
Received: from mail58-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail58-db3
 (MessageSwitch) id 1338368302140831_7342;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.228])	by
 mail58-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E7C1E0044	for
 <roll@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.freescale.net (70.37.183.190) by DB3EHSMHS006.bigfish.com
 (10.3.87.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:20 +0000
Received: from 039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net ([169.254.1.135]) by
 039-SN1MMR1-003.039d.mgd.msft.net ([10.84.1.16]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.005;
 Wed, 30 May 2012 03:58:24 -0500
From: Tecuceanu Andreea-Dana-B10623 <B10623@freescale.com>
To: "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RPLInstanceID parameter from Source Routing Header is missing in
 RFC6554
Thread-Index: Ac0+Pc2lbhIKR8s+RJStkW2FSI3EUQABIDNQ
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:23 +0000
Message-ID: <C4731EA2F8833047869F2B5DB5F72C262E3CD9@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.171.73.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="_000_C4731EA2F8833047869F2B5DB5F72C262E3CD9039SN1MPN1001039d_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com
Subject: [Roll] RPLInstanceID parameter from Source Routing Header is missing
 in RFC6554
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>,
 <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>,
 <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:58:55 -0000

--_000_C4731EA2F8833047869F2B5DB5F72C262E3CD9039SN1MPN1001039d_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I have observed that the RPLInstanceID field from Source Routing header (pr=
esent in  draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-07) was removed in RFC6554.
Are there particular reasons for this? This field is necessary at the DODAG=
 Root when it receives a  Destination Unreachable with code "Error in Sourc=
e Routing Header" to identify the instance with the problem (only if there =
are two instances with the same prefix and if the node is Root in both of t=
hem).


Andreea Tecuceanu
(Freescale Semiconductor)

--_000_C4731EA2F8833047869F2B5DB5F72C262E3CD9039SN1MPN1001039d_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:x=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m=3D"http://schema=
s.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html=
40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
	{font-family:"Cambria Math";
	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
	{mso-style-type:personal;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
	{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple">
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt">Hello,<o:p></o:p></=
span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></=
span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt">I have observed tha=
t the RPLInstanceID field from Source Routing header (present in &nbsp;draf=
t-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-07) was removed in RFC6554.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt">Are there particula=
r reasons for this? This field is necessary at the DODAG Root when it recei=
ves a &nbsp;</span><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font-size:12.0pt">Destination=
 Unreachable with code &quot;Error in Source Routing
 Header&quot; to identify the instance with the problem (only if there are =
two instances with the same prefix and if the node is Root in both of them)=
.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span lang=3D"EN" style=3D"font-size:12.0pt"><o:p>&n=
bsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></=
span></p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><b><span style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot=
;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">Andreea Tecuceanu</span>=
</b><span style=3D"font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;san=
s-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><br>
(Freescale Semiconductor)</span><span style=3D"font-size:12.0pt"><o:p></o:p=
></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_C4731EA2F8833047869F2B5DB5F72C262E3CD9039SN1MPN1001039d_--
