Re: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)

Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com> Thu, 27 June 2019 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF612011C; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CdcUPZNra4hh; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7022612011A; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DD77A171E8F253AC6575; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 05:09:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.45) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 05:09:22 +0100
Received: from BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.118]) by BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 09:33:53 +0530
From: Rahul Arvind Jadhav <rahul.jadhav@huawei.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao@ietf.org>, Peter Van der Stok <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "roll-chairs@ietf.org" <roll-chairs@ietf.org>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVLJnQu3bSQaKly0qv26vkYwa7Dqau3uZw
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 04:03:52 +0000
Message-ID: <982B626E107E334DBE601D979F31785C5DF0C0CD@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <156160670770.20102.6856258611522333962.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156160670770.20102.6856258611522333962.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-IN, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.109.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/roll/EWyNUeSN9KOw8f_FdDutYpsKSUM>
Subject: Re: [Roll] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/roll/>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 04:09:26 -0000

Yes it should be "code" and not a "type" ! Thanks Suresh for noticing this and for the review.
Will fix this.

Thanks,
Rahul


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 4.3

"A new ICMPv6 RPL control message type"

Shouldn't this be "code" instead of "type" given that the RPL control message types are ICMPv6 codes?